2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rotating molecular jet in Orion

Abstract: We present CO(2−1), 13 CO(2−1), CO(6−5), CO(7−6), and SO(6 5 −5 4 ) line observations made with the IRAM 30 m and Atacama Pathfinder Experiment (APEX) radiotelescopes and the Submillimeter Array (SMA) toward the highly collimated (11• ) and extended (∼2 ) southwest lobe of the bipolar outflow Ori-S6 located in the Orion South region. We report for all these lines, the detection of velocity asymmetries about the flow axis with velocity differences roughly on the order of 1 km s −1 over distances of about 5000 A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our observations seem to represent the first detection of SO in EHV gas, bright SO emission in the jet-like components of the HH211 and Ori-S6 outflows have been recently reported by Lee et al (2010) and Zapata et al (2010), respectively. The jet-like component of these outflows has significantly lower velocity than the components in L1448 and I04166, and their emission does not form distinct EHV features in the CO spectra like those shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Although our observations seem to represent the first detection of SO in EHV gas, bright SO emission in the jet-like components of the HH211 and Ori-S6 outflows have been recently reported by Lee et al (2010) and Zapata et al (2010), respectively. The jet-like component of these outflows has significantly lower velocity than the components in L1448 and I04166, and their emission does not form distinct EHV features in the CO spectra like those shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…In a standard gas-phase chemistry (e.g., Liszt et al 2005, p. 187), CO is formed by first producing CO + , via C + + OH ⟶ CO + + H, followed by either CO + + H ⟶ CO + H, or CO + + H 2 ⟶ HCO + + H and HCO + + e ⟶ CO + H. Orion BN/KL is known to be abundant in the products of these reactions, which all proceed relatively fast. Furthermore, high-velocity (∼70-100 km s −1 ) CO from low to very high J levels is observed to correlate well with each of the H 2 (ν=1) outflow peaks (Zapata et al 2010;Peng et al 2012b;Goicoechea et al 2015a). For contrast with the distributions of CH + and C + in relation to the outflow in Figure 26(a), we also show contours of CO ( J=10−9) and OH (1834 GHz triplet) observed with HIFI in Figure 26(b), overlaid onto the H 2 2.12 μm imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The emission features at −38.9 and +65.6 km s −1 in the Hot Core spectrum ( Figure 5), which are relatively symmetric around the main emission component at 8.7 km s −1 , are at first suggestive of velocities in molecular lines such as HF J=1−0 and H 2 O + J=3/2−1/2 absorptions, or in the wings of broad CO J=1−0 emission that have been associated with the LVF (e.g., Zuckerman et al 1976;Schulz et al 1995;Wilson et al 2001;Gupta et al 2010;Phillips et al 2010;Zapata et al 2010;Peng et al 2012a). However, careful inspection shows that the blueshifted feature can be attributed to H O 2 18 while the redshifted feature is dominated by H 2 S, which have both been modeled by Crockett et al (2014b).…”
Section: + Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, our SMA observations do reveal the presence of typical shock tracers (e.g., SiO, SO, and SO 2 ) in the bubble. The Orion hot core mentioned earlier is located toward the southeast quadrant of the bubble (see Figure 2), and was recently suggested to be caused by the impact of a shock wave related to the dynamical decay of BN, I, and n onto a dense pre-existing core called the "Extended Ridge" (Zapata et al 2010). To explain the near systemic mean velocity of the hot core, the authors of that suggestion argued that the shock wave must be fairly slow, and interact with a particularly dense and massive material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%