2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2002.2591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rotational Approach to Localized SPAMM 1–1 Tagging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2002 and 2003, Ikonomidou and Sergiadis presented two studies about localized SPAMM [51] and variable-density SPAMM [52], respectively. In the first study [51], the authors examined the effect of selective excitation pulses on the SPAMM sequence, and showed that in the case of two identical RF pulses, the phase components are canceled out, and thus preemphasis and refocusing gradients are not needed, allowing for using constant gradients throughout the tagging sequence or choosing nonrefocusable maximum- and minimum-phase RF pulses.…”
Section: Spammmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2002 and 2003, Ikonomidou and Sergiadis presented two studies about localized SPAMM [51] and variable-density SPAMM [52], respectively. In the first study [51], the authors examined the effect of selective excitation pulses on the SPAMM sequence, and showed that in the case of two identical RF pulses, the phase components are canceled out, and thus preemphasis and refocusing gradients are not needed, allowing for using constant gradients throughout the tagging sequence or choosing nonrefocusable maximum- and minimum-phase RF pulses.…”
Section: Spammmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first study [51], the authors examined the effect of selective excitation pulses on the SPAMM sequence, and showed that in the case of two identical RF pulses, the phase components are canceled out, and thus preemphasis and refocusing gradients are not needed, allowing for using constant gradients throughout the tagging sequence or choosing nonrefocusable maximum- and minimum-phase RF pulses. In the second study [52], the authors presented a new way of combining 1-1 SPAMM with selective excitation pulses to restrict the tagging grid to regions of interest and produce tagging grid of different density in each region.…”
Section: Spammmentioning
confidence: 99%