2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rotational Cylindrical fMRI Phantom for Image Quality Control

Abstract: PurposeA novel phantom for image quality testing for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans is described.MethodsThe cylindrical, rotatable, ~4.5L phantom, with eight wedge-shaped compartments, is used to simulate rest and activated states. The compartments contain NiCl2 doped agar gel with alternating concentrations of agar (1.4%, 1.6%) to produce T1 and T2 values approximating brain grey matter. The Jacard index was used to compare the image distortions for echo planar imaging (EPI) and gradient r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No shimming was performed in an attempt to mimic the variable B 0 environment of the in vivo situation. As has been previously proposed to quantify EPI distortions , the Jaccard self‐similarity index was computed to compare the spatial distribution of acquired proton and carbon images pre‐ and post‐correction. The Jaccard index represents the area of intersection over the area of union of two binary sets X i and X j , and is defined as Jij=|XiXj||XiXj|, Jij[0, 1]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No shimming was performed in an attempt to mimic the variable B 0 environment of the in vivo situation. As has been previously proposed to quantify EPI distortions , the Jaccard self‐similarity index was computed to compare the spatial distribution of acquired proton and carbon images pre‐ and post‐correction. The Jaccard index represents the area of intersection over the area of union of two binary sets X i and X j , and is defined as Jij=|XiXj||XiXj|, Jij[0, 1]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grey value in MRI, simply defined as poor image quality, is dependent on two factors: signal intensity and noise. 16 All images contain a level of background noise. Noise is always present and results from the electromagnetic noise caused by the movement of charged particles in the body, small anomalies in the measurement tools and other magnetic objects in the room.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noise is always present and results from the electromagnetic noise caused by the movement of charged particles in the body, small anomalies in the measurement tools and other magnetic objects in the room. 16 Image quality depends on the homogeneity of the magnetic field and any metal introduced anywhere into the field distorts the static magnetic field, which may cause clip artefact (the enhancement and loss of signal). Even non-magnetic materials may cause artefacts by conducting current, which creates a new local magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…change only accounts for a small fraction of the total signal (less than 5% for MRI systems with a magnetic field from 1.5 to 3 Tesla) (4,28), and extracting real BOLD signals from the total MR signal requires overcoming noise from various sources (28). To track the brain cognitive process, MR scanners need excellent temporal stability to acquire the BOLD signal over time (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To track the brain cognitive process, MR scanners need excellent temporal stability to acquire the BOLD signal over time (28). Additionally, fMRI usually applies fast imaging sequences such as echo planar imaging (EPI), which require excellent time resolutions and temporal stability during fMRI (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). EPI is sensitive to susceptibility effects (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%