1999
DOI: 10.17487/rfc2681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Round-trip Delay Metric for IPPM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these metrics are completely described by the Internet Protocol Performance Metrics (IPPM) working group of the IETF. Concretely, the delay measurements in one way [4] and round-trip [5] are really important for this work, as these methodologies are grounded standards and good examples of how to measure the latency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these metrics are completely described by the Internet Protocol Performance Metrics (IPPM) working group of the IETF. Concretely, the delay measurements in one way [4] and round-trip [5] are really important for this work, as these methodologies are grounded standards and good examples of how to measure the latency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…o The two-way delay is defined in [8] to be the time elapsed from the start of transmission of the first bit of a packet by an End Point until the reception of the last bit of that packet by the same End Point.…”
Section: Packet Delay Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every day, more than 2000 probes are performed for each test box pair. The interval between two consecutive probes is randomized according to a Poisson distribution, as recommended in [9]. The measurements done also include packet losses, path information, bandwidth and delay variation.…”
Section: Alg 1 the Adaptative Vivaldi Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to identify the path with the lowest delay is to probe all available paths. However, measuring adequately the delay of a path typically requires many probes, distributed over time [9]. For example, RON [10] uses at least 10 probes to estimate the latency of a path, with 14 seconds in average between two consecutive probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%