A rule-based expert system for the automatic classification of DNA ?ploidy? histograms measured by the CAS 200 image analysis system

Abstract

DNA “ploidy” histogram interpretation is one of the most important sources of variation in DNA image cytometry and is influenced by multiple technical factors such as scaling, selection of peaks, and variable classification criteria. A rule‐based expert system was developed to automate and eliminate subjectivity from this interpretative process. Ninety‐eight Feulgen stained histologic sections from patients with breast, colon, and lung cancer were measured with the CAS 200 image analysis system (Becton Dickinson, Santa Clara, CA); they included diploid (n = 42), aneuploid (n = 46), tetraploid (n = 7), and multiploid (n = 3) examples. The data was converted from listmode format into ASCII with the aid of CELLSHEET software (JVC Imaging, Elmhurst, IL). Individual microphotometric nuclear measurements were sorted to one of 64 bins based on DNA index. The 64 bins were then divided into 5 semi‐arbitrarily defined ranges: hypodiploid, diploid, aneuploid, tetraploid, and hypertetraploid. The nuclear percentages in each range were calculated with EXCEL 4.0 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). The histograms were divided into 2 equal sets: training and testing. The data from the training set were used to develop 16 IF‐THEN rules to classify the histograms into diploid, aneuploid, or tetraploid. A macro was programmed in EXCEL to automate all these operations. The rule‐based expert system classified correctly 45/50 histograms of the training set. Two tetraploid histograms were classified as aneuploid. Three multiploid histograms were classified as tetraploid. All histograms in the testing set were correctly classified by the expert system. The potential role of rule‐based expert system technology for the objective classification of DNA “ploidy” histograms measured by image cytometry is discussed. Cytometry 30:39–46, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Classification of Individual Lung Cancer Cell Lines Based on DNA Methylation Markers

“…Multiple studies done during the past four decades have developed objective diagnostic methods based on multivariate analysis of morphometric and densitometric data from neoplastic cells. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Such classificatory methods can be based on supervised or non-supervised paradigms. 4 "Unsupervised" methods attempt to explore or "mine" the data to detect relationships without any a priori information regarding the classification of the data.…”

Kinetic profiles of intraepithelial and invasive prostatic neoplasias: the key role of down-regulated apoptosis in tumor progression

“…External diploid controls (rat hepatocytes provided by Becton-Dickinson) were included in each staining batch to normalize results. Several 5-µm sections were used for this analysis, according to previously published protocols that have proven valid in such material [19,29,46].…”