A rule management framework for negotiating mobile agents

Tu, M. Tuan; Kunze, Christian P.; Lamersdorf, Winfried

doi:10.1109/edoc.2000.882353

Cited by 12 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As can be seen above, most existing frameworks (Cardoso & Oliveira, 2000;Tu et al, 2001;Bichler et al, 2002) are suited to the particular needs of the system at hand and cannot be applied across the board in other scenarios. On the other hand, the frameworks by Strobel, (2001) and Bartolini et al, (2002) fulfill many functions of an e-negotiation platform.…”

Section: Existing Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recent software frameworks for the design and implementation of e-negotiation media and support tools include SMACE (Cardoso & Oliveira, 2000), DynamiCS (Tu et al, 2001), INSULA (Benyoucef et al, 2001), SILKROAD (Strobel, 2001), MAP (Bichler et al, 2002), and Bartolini et al, 2002. In SILKROAD, Strobel proposed a design and application framework for electronic negotiations.…”

Section: Existing Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The other advantage is that protocol specifications can be explicitly passed between agents and reasoned over. Tu et al (2001), on the other hand, developed DynamiCS-an actorbased framework for negotiating mobile agents. This framework is based on the notion of an actor system, which decomposes an application component into autonomously executing subcomponents cooperating with each other.…”

Section: Existing Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

SOLACE: A Framework for Electronic Negotiations

Abass¹,

Ghinea²

2006

Journal of Intelligent Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most existing frameworks for electronic negotiations today are tied to specific negotiation systems for which they were developed, preventing them from being applied to other negotiation scenarios. Thus, the evaluation of electronic negotiation systems is difficult as each one is based on a different framework. Additionally, each developer has to design a new framework for any system to be developed, leading to a 'reinvention of the wheel'. This paper presents SOLACE-a generic framework for multi-issue negotiations, which can be applied to a variety of negotiation scenarios. In contrast with other frameworks for electronic negotiations, SOLACE supports hybrid systems in which the negotiation participants can be humans, agents or a combination of the two. By recognizing the importance of strategies in negotiations and incorporating a time attribute in negotiation proposals, SOLACE enhances existing approaches and provides a foundation for the flexible electronic negotiation systems of the future.

show abstract

Section: Existing Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Existing Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Existing Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

SOLACE: A Framework for Electronic Negotiations

Abass¹,

Ghinea²

2006

Journal of Intelligent Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The main issue is that the web-service component model constrains the scope of service composition. Independent from the web-service stack, recent works on service composition include PIC-COLA [1], ICARIS [15], DynamiCS [16], E-Flow [4], and DySCo [12]. In relation to FRESCO, the main limitation we identify in such works lays in the service model assumed.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our focus is on the dynamic nature of composite services. Capitalising on the experience of research projects such as COSMOS [7], DynamiCS [16] and DySCo [12], our goal is to develop a conceptual and technology framework for dynamic service composition. The intended users of such framework are technical developers as well as business developers.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%