2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A run-to-run control strategy to adjust basal insulin infusion rates in type 1 diabetes

Abstract: Maintaining good glycemic control is a daily challenge for people with type 1 diabetes. Insulin requirements are changing constantly due to many factors, such as levels of stress and physical activity. The basal insulin requirement also has a circadian rhythm, adding another level of complexity. Automating the adjustment of insulin dosing would result in improved glycemic control, as well as an improved quality of life by significantly reducing the burden on the patient. Building on our previous success of usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Postprandial performance was superior in IMC-SMC with feedforward, highlighting the limitations of purely reactive control algorithms. The smooth curve used to approximate the variations in insulin sensitivity provides a more realistic approximation for the gradual change in insulin sensitivity during the day than constant or stepchanging sensitivity used in most of previous works (see 10 for example [2,11,22,24,25]). The designed controller was able to handle up to ±50% error in meal announcement-which is a gross error in comparison with errors usually used in literature [22,23], without reaching the severe limits of 50 and 280 mg/dl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postprandial performance was superior in IMC-SMC with feedforward, highlighting the limitations of purely reactive control algorithms. The smooth curve used to approximate the variations in insulin sensitivity provides a more realistic approximation for the gradual change in insulin sensitivity during the day than constant or stepchanging sensitivity used in most of previous works (see 10 for example [2,11,22,24,25]). The designed controller was able to handle up to ±50% error in meal announcement-which is a gross error in comparison with errors usually used in literature [22,23], without reaching the severe limits of 50 and 280 mg/dl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During experiments 2-3 (days [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the run-to-run procedure attains a good glycemic regulation within a few days. The subsequent meal perturbations during experiment 4 (days 15-24) produce some excursions that are, however, kept under control.…”
Section: Assessment Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These hybrid methods try to benefit from the repetitive nature of insulin therapy to improve iteratively the efficacy of insulin doses by using run-to-run control algorithms [20,21,42,43]. In a situation with frequent data sampling, iterative learning control (ILC) is the alternative of choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%