2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.02.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A runtime estimation framework for ALICE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 summarizes major similarities and differences between our work and the existing studies. First, the examined papers concern various application domains: load sharing facility (LSF) [8], parallel program [9], [11], [25], cloud [10], [29], HPC [2], [14], [15], [19], location-based services [20]- [23], databases [26]- [28], big data applications [29], [30], and scientific workloads [12], [13], [16]- [19]. The runtime estimation problem addressed in this paper applies to the scientific workloads domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 summarizes major similarities and differences between our work and the existing studies. First, the examined papers concern various application domains: load sharing facility (LSF) [8], parallel program [9], [11], [25], cloud [10], [29], HPC [2], [14], [15], [19], location-based services [20]- [23], databases [26]- [28], big data applications [29], [30], and scientific workloads [12], [13], [16]- [19]. The runtime estimation problem addressed in this paper applies to the scientific workloads domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these [26], [27], [29] developed (pure) analytical models and assess the validity of the model. Many of the existing studies [20]- [24], [28] build neural-net based learning models and utilize them for deriving estimated time; many others [2], [10], [16]- [19], [25], [30] use tree and linear regression based machine learning models. Some other works [11], [12], [14], [15] use hybrid methods combining these tools-analytical model, machine learning, and deep learning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pumma et al [90] use an approach that completely ignores metadata. Instead, each job is run for a short while and profiled using platform independent low level features derived from hardware performance counters.…”
Section: Resource Usage Pattern Modeling At the Job Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many developments in performance prediction can be categorized into Regression [24], [25], [31], [32], [33], Classification [34], [35], Similarity based predictions [36], [37], and dynamic Time-Series predictions [26], [27], [38], [39], [40], [41] . We can also index these techniques on other dimensions, depending on priority of workflow application, such as ease of data collection for Machine Learning tech-niques, level of sophistication involved in instrumenting a resource for time-series based dynamic prediction, sourcecode evaluation for intrusive methods, and workload modeling methods for platforms with resource-contention.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] presents an on-line estimation scheme that uses correlations among data sets combined with clustering techniques for non-obvious scenarios, where correlations are hard to model. [35] deploys application-profiles to estimate run times, and tests on real data sets. This work samples workload, performs classification and leverages category specific model for run time prediction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%