2022
DOI: 10.1177/2327857922111028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rural Community Hospital’s Perioperative Surgical Home Model Compared to a Traditional Surgical System

Abstract: Background: The Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH) was designed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) to improve perioperative care through more coordinated and communicative decision-making. PSH has proven success in large urban health centers by reducing surgery cancellation, operating room time, length of stay (LOS), and readmission rates. Yet, only limited studies have assessed the impact of PSH on surgical outcomes in rural areas. Thus, this study compared surgical outcomes – LOS, discharge di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research study’s primary objective was to evaluate the newly implemented PSH system at a local rural, community hospital by comparing TJR surgical outcomes using a longitudinal case-control study design. Based on our preliminary study[ 32 ], it was hypothesized that the implementation of the PSH in the rural community hospital would positively impact patients’ TJR outcomes ( i.e. , shorter LOS, reduced readmissions, and increased rate of home discharge) across three distinct cohorts for the case-control design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research study’s primary objective was to evaluate the newly implemented PSH system at a local rural, community hospital by comparing TJR surgical outcomes using a longitudinal case-control study design. Based on our preliminary study[ 32 ], it was hypothesized that the implementation of the PSH in the rural community hospital would positively impact patients’ TJR outcomes ( i.e. , shorter LOS, reduced readmissions, and increased rate of home discharge) across three distinct cohorts for the case-control design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%