2021
DOI: 10.1115/1.4049881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Safety Factor Method for Reliability-Based Component Design

Abstract: Reliability-based design (RBD) identifies design variables that maintain reliability at a required level. For many routine component design jobs, RBD may not be practical as it requires nonlinear optimization and specific reliability methods, especially for those design jobs which are performed manually or with a spreadsheet. This work develops a practical approach to reliability-based component design so that the reliability target can be achieved by conducting traditional component design repeatedly using a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gupta et al 28) conducted stress analysis (von Mises) for various alloy materials and loading cases using ANSYS, concluding that aluminum alloys are lightweight but prone to deformation 29) . Therefore, components experiencing the highest von Mises stress should be reinforced in accordance with design safety standards, as a manufacturing consideration following ASME Standard 30) . Safety factor assisted in evaluating safety of a component or structure, even when using minimal dimensions 31) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gupta et al 28) conducted stress analysis (von Mises) for various alloy materials and loading cases using ANSYS, concluding that aluminum alloys are lightweight but prone to deformation 29) . Therefore, components experiencing the highest von Mises stress should be reinforced in accordance with design safety standards, as a manufacturing consideration following ASME Standard 30) . Safety factor assisted in evaluating safety of a component or structure, even when using minimal dimensions 31) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between SF and R has been demonstrated by Mischke [52] as an improvement [53,54]. Additionally, the SF technique has been proposed for reliability-based design optimization to reduce the complexity involved in reliability analysis [55]. Over-designed products can arise when engineers choose excessively high safety factors.…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantification With Latin Hypercube Sampling (Lhs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These generally apply optimisation search of an objective function computed based on uncertainty. Reliability based optimisation methods can also be used to solve for the most probable point solution to the robust design problem (Jiang et al 2013;Hu & Du 2019;Yin & Du 2021). Surrogate models of the mean and variance can be fit as functions of design variables (Chen et al 1996;Fang, Li, & Sudjianto 2005;Allen et al 2006;Chen, Jin, & Sudjianto 2006).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RDM is more than a statistical experiment, it involves a multiple step workflow including identifying possible sources of variability, quantifying their relative contribution with noise experiments, generating ideas for design changes that may promote variation reduction and then quantifying the ability of design changes to reduce this variability through a further set of experiments. Modern computer-based methodological updates include use of uncertainty quantification (UQ), surrogate modelling, global sensitivity analysis (GSA) and optimisation (Chen et al 1996;Du & Chen 2001;Jin, Chen, & Simpson 2001;Du, Sudjianto, & Chen 2004;Fang, Li, & Sudjianto 2005;Allen et al 2006;Chen, Jin, & Sudjianto 2006;Jiang et al 2013;Jiang, Chen, & German 2016;Hu & Du 2019;Otto & Sanchez 2019;Otto, Wang, & Uyan 2019;Nellippallil et al 2020;Sanchez, Björkman, & Otto 2020;Yin & Du 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%