A sanctuary in post‐conflict space: the baptist church as a ‘middle option’ in banovina, croatia

Abstract

One of the observable aspects of social change during the transition period in most post-socialist countries is the revival of religion. The resurgence of churches has accompanied national revival and in some countries it is also connected to a growing post-socialist nationalism. This article focuses on the development of different -'transnational' -religious options in an area of ethnic conflict by presenting a case study of the post-war growth of the Baptist Church in the Banovina region in Croatia, close to the Bosnian border. Research results are based on halfstructured interviews with church representatives and members.The research shows that there has been a considerable post-war expansion of the Baptist Church in the Banovina region, and that it is mainly ethnic Serbs and people from mixed marriages who have joined the Church. Many of them have a background as communists. For them, neither the Catholic Church, which is regarded as a Croatian church, nor the Serbian Orthodox Church are viable religious options. Instead, there are three factors that make the 'Baptist option' attractive. First, it is grounded in the historical tradition of the Baptist Church in this region and on memories and myths activated in the war and post-war periods. Second, the Baptist Church has made a middle transnational option available in an ethnically mixed area. As such it attracts those who are searching for a niche of neutrality in an ethnically strongly divided region characterized by conflict. Third, the considerable humanitarian work and help of organizations related to the Baptist Church during and after the war not only added in the eyes of many people in need to its image elements of existential shelter, but also brought the Church out of the shadows and made it more 'visible' -thereby improving its former reputation as an obscure sect.

Shooting up illicit drugs with God and the State: the legal–spatial constitution of Sydney's Medically Supervised Injecting Centre as a sanctuary

“…This article advances two aspects of the geographies of sanctuary. First, it furthers understanding of the role of religious traditions, particularly Catholic denominations, in the constitution of sanctuary within the context of state politics (Henel and Šakaja, ; Cunningham, ; Sanyal, ); and broader discussions on how religious traditions have maintained a geographically varied but nevertheless consistent presence in the constitution of place at various spatial scales within contemporary societies (Kong, ; Holloway and Valins, ; Yorgason and Dora, ; Wilford, ; Cloke and Beaumont, ). Secondly, it furthers insight into the role of law in the constitution of sanctuary (Delaney, ; ; Ridgley, ; Darling, ).…”

Strategies of salvation: Evangelical Christian praxis and sites of degradation in Sri Lanka

“…When he needed government permission to access a refugee camp in order to distribute aid, he networked with key personnel in the area because ‘we have to keep the network strong and the correct way; if we do the wrong way … everything [is] going to close’. In order to establish a network ‘the correct way’, the NGO purposely remained silent about the ways in which it worked with evangelical pastors and churches in the area (‘we cannot network with them otherwise’), thus offering extra‐group personnel a blinkered view of its evangelical ambitions (see Henkel and Sakaja, ). The breadth and vigour of such networking lends credence to the manager's assertion that ‘really, we are sowing a seed everywhere’.…”

The spatial modalities of evangelical Christian growth in Sri Lanka: evangelism, social ministry and the structural mosaic

“…; Hopkins ). Leveraging the structural mosaic causes evangelical groups to exploit ‘secular advantages’ (Henkel and Sakaja , 51) in and through both religious and secular spaces, a dynamic that encourages more nuanced understandings of ‘the ways that power works through the various levels, realms and conceptions of space, in and through religious processes’ (McAlister , 249). Moreover, exploring the method and effect of realising evangelical agency in and through secular space contributes to an understanding of not just religious growth, but religious conversion as well.…”

“…The structural mosaic presupposes multiple layers of spatial ordering that obfuscate the distinction between structure and agency. In doing so, it creates niches that enable new religious options to establish a foothold in a locality and flourish (see Henkel and Sakaja ). As a result, spaces of evangelism are necessarily complex and multi‐layered in order to overcome the stifling prohibitiveness of the structural context.…”