2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29808-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sarcopenia index based on serum creatinine and cystatin C cannot accurately detect either low muscle mass or sarcopenia in urban community-dwelling older people

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of the sarcopenia index (serum creatinine [mg/dl]/cystatin C [mg/dl] × 100) for estimating low muscle mass and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults. We included 371 older adults (≥60 years) with normal kidney function. Four common diagnostic criteria (the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP), Asia Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS), International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS), and Foundation for the National Inst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We validated our findings in an independent cohort and confirmed that a reduced SI (indicative of lower muscle mass) was associated with poorer outcomes, including frailty . These findings differ somewhat from a recently published study in 371 community‐dwelling adults ≥60 years old with normal kidney function . These authors found that SI exhibited only modest accuracy for prediction of muscle mass or sarcopenia depending on the definition utilized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We validated our findings in an independent cohort and confirmed that a reduced SI (indicative of lower muscle mass) was associated with poorer outcomes, including frailty . These findings differ somewhat from a recently published study in 371 community‐dwelling adults ≥60 years old with normal kidney function . These authors found that SI exhibited only modest accuracy for prediction of muscle mass or sarcopenia depending on the definition utilized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…11 These findings differ somewhat from a recently published study in 371 community-dwelling adults ࣙ60 years old with normal kidney function. 27 These authors found that SI exhibited only modest accuracy for prediction of muscle mass or sarcopenia depending on the definition utilized. We hypothesize that their lower incidence of reduced muscle mass (19%-57% vs 70%), decreased overall prevalence of sarcopenia (11%-25%), and differences in the study populations (community vs ICU) and definitions utilized could explain these disparate findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we aforementioned, due to the defects of current diagnostic methods for sarcopenia, the validation of a specific biomarker as the surrogate marker of sarcopenia is an attractive method 25 . As a newcomer in this field, the SI and a very similar biomarker (serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio) are of low cost, high accessibility, and repeatability 26 , therefore, they have been studied in different populations since being introduced in 2015 [16][17][18][19]27 . Only two previous studies addressed the association between the SI and mortality 16,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the SI can accurately estimate sarcopenia in older people, it would be of great value for simplifying the diagnostic procedure of sarcopenia. Unfortunately, our team compared the SI with four classic diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia and found it could not accurately detect either low muscle mass or sarcopenia in community-dwelling older people 18 . However, most recently, Barreto et al 19 reported that the SI was a predictor of muscle mass and related to longer hospital length of stay and frailty among 171 ICU patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that a "gold standard" operational definition of sarcopenia is still lacking, we decided to opt for using a multi-algorithms strategy to define and detect "sarcopenic" older adults from the participants of this study, in line with previous studies [55,56]. More specifically, we used the 1st and 2nd version of the EWGSOP, respectively EWGSOP1 [4] and EWGSOP2 [5], the IWGS [6], the SCWD [7] and the FNIH [8].…”
Section: Operational Definition Of Sarcopeniamentioning
confidence: 99%