This paper focuses on succinctness results for fragments of Linear Temporal Logic with Past ($$\textsf{LTL}$$
LTL
) devoid of binary temporal operators like until, and provides methods to establish them. We prove that there is a family of cosafety languages $$(\mathcal {L}_n)_{n \ge 1}$$
(
L
n
)
n
≥
1
such that $$\mathcal {L}_n$$
L
n
can be expressed with a pure future formula of size $$\mathcal {O}(n)$$
O
(
n
)
, but it requires formulae of size $$2^{\varOmega (n)}$$
2
Ω
(
n
)
to be captured with past formulae. As a by-product, such a succinctness result shows the optimality of the pastification algorithm proposed in [Artale et al., KR, 2023].We show that, in the considered case, succinctness cannot be proven by relying on the classical automata-based method introduced in [Markey, Bull. EATCS, 2003]. In place of this method, we devise and apply a combinatorial proof system whose deduction trees represent $$\textsf{LTL}$$
LTL
formulae. The system can be seen as a proof-centric (one-player) view on the games used by Adler and Immerman to study the succinctness of $$\textsf{CTL}$$
CTL
.