2009 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - Digest of Technical Papers 2009
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2009.4977334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SAW-less multiband WEDGE receiver

Abstract: With an ever-increasing number of frequency bands supported by cellular transceivers (TRX), front-end (FE) complexity increases due to a large number of external SAW filters. The challenge of removing inter-stage filters from multiband 3G receivers (RX) resides in the additional noise contribution due to limited transmitter (TX) leakage rejection at the RX input, intermodulation (IM) products and cross-compression due to TX leakage and strong out-ofband blockers. Increased downconverter dynamic range is thus r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described earlier out-of-band linearity poses a major challenge both in cellular FDD systems, like WCDMA/HSPA [1], [3] and CDMA [28], and in multistandard devices where several different radio protocols can operate simultaneously causing inter-system interference due to finite isolation between different RF nodes [7]. Therefore extensive research on different linearization techniques has resulted in remarkable improvements both with respect to IIP3 and IIP2 to enable the removal of bulky passive filters.…”
Section: A Receiver Architectures For Portable Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described earlier out-of-band linearity poses a major challenge both in cellular FDD systems, like WCDMA/HSPA [1], [3] and CDMA [28], and in multistandard devices where several different radio protocols can operate simultaneously causing inter-system interference due to finite isolation between different RF nodes [7]. Therefore extensive research on different linearization techniques has resulted in remarkable improvements both with respect to IIP3 and IIP2 to enable the removal of bulky passive filters.…”
Section: A Receiver Architectures For Portable Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially the trade-off between off-chip, passive out-of-band filtering and linearity remains a major challenge in highly optimized FDD (frequency-division duplexing) systems like WCDMA [1] or LTE. Local RF loops have been proposed to remove the highest blockers for example using feed-forward injection in [2] but still most of the commercial receivers, e.g., [3] techniques [4] including bandpass approach [5] have been presented as solutions for a software-defined radio (SDR) [6]. However, they can not address the RF linearity issue, and especially converters suffer from limited dynamic range and in many cases also from excessive power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2*LO-LO topology is used to realize a 25% duty cycle [1], and has good performance for the RF front-end mixer [2]. In this paper we present a new switching topology for a quadrature sampling mixer(QSM) to realize the 25% duty cycle for application in a SAW-less GPS receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to limited isolation between TX and GPS receiver, a SAW filter is normally deployed to reject TX leakage, which degrades sensitivity and NF. However a SAW-less system is highly desired to save area and cost.A 2*LO-LO topology is used to realize a 25% duty cycle [1], and has good performance for the RF front-end mixer [2]. In this paper we present a new switching topology for a quadrature sampling mixer(QSM) to realize the 25% duty cycle for application in a SAW-less GPS receiver.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimization of the area occupied by the LNAs is therefore important. Virtually every transceiver for mobile phone applications published to date makes use of LNAs employing on-chip [3,5] or on-passivation [4] spiral inductors. Spiral inductors are large and do not scale with technology, leading to an increasing relative cost of the receiver front-end with newer technology nodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%