2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32258-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scalable Petri Net Representation of Interaction Protocols for Overhearing

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I presented a comprehensive theoretical model that is constructed from three components. The first models the representation of conversation protocols (which were the focus of my research in [2]). The second models a complete conversation system, a set of instantiated conversations that take place in a multi-agent system.…”
Section: Formal Model and Conversation Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I presented a comprehensive theoretical model that is constructed from three components. The first models the representation of conversation protocols (which were the focus of my research in [2]). The second models a complete conversation system, a set of instantiated conversations that take place in a multi-agent system.…”
Section: Formal Model and Conversation Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the first research issue [2], I addressed representation of multiagent conversations for overhearing. In open distributed MAS, agents often coordinate using standardized communications.…”
Section: Representing Conversation Pro-tocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors would like to thank the anonymous JAIR reviewers for many useful and informative comments. Minor subsets of this work were also published as LNAI book chapter (Gutnik & Kaminka, 2004b). K. Ushi deserves many thanks.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible extension in the line of [25] is the integration of formal methods to perform validation tests, i.e., to check the coherence of the AUML description with the specifications derived from the analysis. To this aim, it is possible to rely on works that give to AUML sequence diagrams a semantics based on Petri Nets [22,23,12]. Validation tests, however, are just one side of the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%