2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scalable satellite-based crop yield mapper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
226
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 435 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
226
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracies achieved in this study are similar to those found in other studies that use automated approaches to map crop production and do not use any calibration data [34][35][36]. Though our previous work found that accuracies can likely improve when using classified Landsat satellite data for calibration [11], it is not feasible to use this calibration method across large spatial and temporal scales in an automated way because the Landsat satellite data needed for calibration are not available in every region and in every year due to issues with cloud cover ( Figure S1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The accuracies achieved in this study are similar to those found in other studies that use automated approaches to map crop production and do not use any calibration data [34][35][36]. Though our previous work found that accuracies can likely improve when using classified Landsat satellite data for calibration [11], it is not feasible to use this calibration method across large spatial and temporal scales in an automated way because the Landsat satellite data needed for calibration are not available in every region and in every year due to issues with cloud cover ( Figure S1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Explana- 1 m. This indicates substantial benefit to using higher-resolution imagery for yield prediction in smallholder systems, but also suggests that lower-resolution imagery is not without value in the absence of alternatives. A second issue is whether one can avoid the need for ground calibration by instead using crop model simulations as training data (13). To test this, crop simulations were run for the study years using daily weather data from a local station and then used to estimate a regression model to predict yields from 1-m GCVI (Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we used the mean temperature ( ) from May through July; precipitation and vapor pressure deficit were not significant at both the B-K sub-region and the 1AF region based on our preliminary analysis, thus, were excluded from the model. The second approach, referred to as the "uncalibrated" approach, used a well-validated crop model to generate pseudo-observations of yields and VIs to derive the regression coefficients of β in Equations (1) [6,7]. In this way, ground-measured yield was no longer …”
Section: Satellite Based Yield Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%