2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scale for rating the quality of psychological trials for pain

Abstract: This paper reports the development of a scale for assessing the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials for psychological treatments. The Delphi method was used in which a panel of 15-12 experts generated statements relating to treatment and design components of trials. After three rounds, statements with high consensus agreement were reviewed by a second expert panel and rewritten as a scale. Evidence to support the reliability and validity of the scale is reported. Three expert and five novice rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
101
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We could meet and report on most of the requirements for efficacy studies [15] by concurrently guarantying high generalisability of the results as demanded for effectiveness studies. We provided convincing external validity, as our participants Values are expressed as absolute numbers (%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We could meet and report on most of the requirements for efficacy studies [15] by concurrently guarantying high generalisability of the results as demanded for effectiveness studies. We provided convincing external validity, as our participants Values are expressed as absolute numbers (%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was conducted following CONSORT guidelines and guidelines for rating the quality of psychological trials for pain published by Yates et al [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This included fields for describing the ECHO and all items from the quality rating scale developed by Yates et al (2005). 16 The Yates Quality Rating Scale (YQRS) has been developed to assess the quality of RCTs of psychological trials for chronic pain. Studies were not excluded based on quality.…”
Section: Data Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also evidence that more recently designed trials are of better quality. Scales for assessing design quality of complex interventions that cannot be double blind 31 indicate an improvement in controlling various biases, such as blinding of assessors, better randomization, better data analysis protocols, and equivalence of treatment expectations.…”
Section: Evidence Of Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%