2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scaled framework for strain rate sensitive structures subjected to high rate impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The material distortion for the difference of density, yield stress and strain-rate-sensitivity between scaled model and prototype can also be compensated by increasing one more number and one more basic factor into the VSG system, where and were structure mass and density, respectively (Mazzariol, et al, 2016). The solutions of material distortion, further including material strain hardening effects, were verified by a group of transport equations of the continuum mechanics in the work of Sadeghi, et al (2019a;. In addition, a new technique -adding extra mass to correct the density of structure, was proposed to compensate the non-scalability of gravity and material strain-rate-sensitivity (Jiang et al, 2016;Wei and Hu, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The material distortion for the difference of density, yield stress and strain-rate-sensitivity between scaled model and prototype can also be compensated by increasing one more number and one more basic factor into the VSG system, where and were structure mass and density, respectively (Mazzariol, et al, 2016). The solutions of material distortion, further including material strain hardening effects, were verified by a group of transport equations of the continuum mechanics in the work of Sadeghi, et al (2019a;. In addition, a new technique -adding extra mass to correct the density of structure, was proposed to compensate the non-scalability of gravity and material strain-rate-sensitivity (Jiang et al, 2016;Wei and Hu, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Special Servo hydraulic Frames, Gleeble 100- 10 3 Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (in tension) 10 4 Expanding Ring >10 5 Flyer Plate…”
Section: <01mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special Servo-hydraulic Frames 10- 10 3 Torsional Impact 100- 10 4 Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (in torsion) 10 3 -10 4 Double-notch Shear and Punch 10 4 -10 7 Pressure-shear Plate Impact…”
Section: <01 Conventional Shear Tests 01-100mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some different materials behaved good similarity, while others had significant errors [19]. A more comprehensive consideration for distortion of the different materials further including strain-hardening effects, temperature effects and failure are developed by Sadeghi et al [21,22], and a fixed strain and strain-rate window instead of the average strain and strain-rate was used to simplify the previous indirect difficulty. However, this method can only provide inexact prediction ability and usually result in obvious errors for similarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%