1966
DOI: 10.2307/1126439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scalogram Study of Classificatory Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous work (e.g., Bigler & Liben, 1992Kofsky, 1966), classification skill was sigruficantly related to age, r(56) = .31, p < .05, with older children showing more advanced classification skills. In addition, sex of participant was significantly related to self-esteem.…”
Section: Relations Among Variablessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Consistent with previous work (e.g., Bigler & Liben, 1992Kofsky, 1966), classification skill was sigruficantly related to age, r(56) = .31, p < .05, with older children showing more advanced classification skills. In addition, sex of participant was significantly related to self-esteem.…”
Section: Relations Among Variablessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Piaget's findings which have been supported by several studies (Dodwell, 1968;Elkind, a, b, c, 1964Kofsky, 1968;Lovell, Mitchell, & Everett, 1962;Lovell & Ogilvie, 1960Uzgiris, 1964;Wohlwill, 1960) indicate that conservation of substance develops first followed by conservation of weight and then volume. Furthermore, many of the training studies have shown that while there has been some success with certain training procedures designed to help a child understand a particular conservation task, there is mixed evidence with respect to whether or not transfer of learning occurs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Kofsky (1966) presented children ranging from four to nine years of age with a variety of problems. Children as young as age four were able to perform the simple task of placing blocks varying in shape and color into consistent groups.…”
Section: Another Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%