1987
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7519(87)90056-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scanning electron microscope study of L. cuprina larvae and the development of blowfly strike in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b,f). This feature is in agreement with similar morphological characters described in the first instars of L. cuprina (Sandeman et al 1987), C. megacephala (Sukontason et al 2003a) and C. rufifacies (Sukontason et al 2003b), further suggesting that the morphology of these spines may help them to anchor to the substrate during locomotion, rake in food during the feeding process, and provide the ability to abrade or irritate skin resulting in myiasis (Sandeman et al 1987). However, these spines are markedly different from the pair of maxillae found in the first instars of the bot fly, Dermatobia hominis (de Filippis and Leite 1997) or flesh fly, Parasarcophaga dux (Sukontason et al 2003c).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2b,f). This feature is in agreement with similar morphological characters described in the first instars of L. cuprina (Sandeman et al 1987), C. megacephala (Sukontason et al 2003a) and C. rufifacies (Sukontason et al 2003b), further suggesting that the morphology of these spines may help them to anchor to the substrate during locomotion, rake in food during the feeding process, and provide the ability to abrade or irritate skin resulting in myiasis (Sandeman et al 1987). However, these spines are markedly different from the pair of maxillae found in the first instars of the bot fly, Dermatobia hominis (de Filippis and Leite 1997) or flesh fly, Parasarcophaga dux (Sukontason et al 2003c).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The present study shows that some distinctive characteristics of the puparium of L. cuprina (e.g., intersegmental spines between the prothorax and mesothorax, morphology of anterior and posterior spiracles) remain the same as those that could be seen in the third instar of this species utilizing light microscopy (Sukontason et al 2004). The profile of the posterior spiracle of the L. cuprina puparium in this current study matches that of the third instar of this species that was observed with SEM by Sandeman et al (1987). However, the current study also presents characteristics of the bubble membrane and pupal respiratory horn which were only observed in the puparium under SEM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Unlike second and third instar larvae, first instar larvae do not possess abrasive mouthhooks. However, skin damage occurs in the first 24 hours after hatching (Sandeman et al 1987); this suggests that mechanisms other than mechanical disruption might be operating to cause lesion development. Hobson (1931) demonstrated the presence of enzymes with some collagenolytic activity in larvae of L. sericata, and Waterhouse and Irzykiewicz (1957) showed the presence of a similar enzyme secreted by the larvae of L. cuprina.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%