Practitioners in the fields of landscape planning and design seem less taking advantage of, or even paying no attention to, existing findings of scientific research in other disciplines; and, they often conduct so-called "transdisciplinary" study on their own, but most of the outcomes are uncompetitive with those proven research findings in relevant fields. The author believed that it is essentially resulted from several dislocations between landscape practice and modern scientific research, that are, the gaps between holism and deconstruction, elements and functions, as well as graphics and texts. To bridge such gaps, this article puts forward two solutions: one is problem-finding and -addressing, and the other is synthesizing and visualization of research results, particularly through graphical interpretation.
KEY WORDSInterface between Research and Practice; Planning and Design; Practice Research; Dislocation 整理 汪默英 译 田乐 黄延峰 EDITED BY WANG Moying TRANSLATED BY Tina TIAN HUANG Yanfeng 收稿时间 RECEIVED DATE