2019
DOI: 10.25083/2559.5555/4.2/88.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scientometric approach of dynamic science institutionalization in the field of laparoscopic proctocolectomy

Abstract: This scientometric study analyzed the dynamic institutionalization of research on laparoscopic proctocolectomy and outlined the most significant institutions, scientists, journals and conference proceedings. A retrospective problem-oriented, title-word based search was done in Web of Science Core Collection (WoS), MEDLINE and BIOSIS Citation Index (BIOSIS) between 2008-2017. The following parameters were comparatively assessed: the annual dynamics of publications; the languages of publications; the authors; th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to an original scientometric concept, there is a unity of the institutionalization, interdisciplinarity and internationalization of contemporary science and university education [4,5]. Along with the acknowledged problem-ori-ented denominations of single institutions of different organizational type, the following essential components belong to science institutionalization defined as a historically established disciplinary organization of scientific and higher educational structures [5][6][7]: i) the organization of national and international scientific forums on a concrete interdisciplinary (or narrow-monodisciplinary) topic; ii) the regular publication of problem-oriented and narrow-or broad-profile inter-or monodisciplinary journals and monographs and their subsequent inclusion in secondary information sources and databases; iii) foundation of national and international scientific societies and associations; iv) establishing of corresponding university departments and/or their subdivisions performing a regular students' education; v) introduction of postgraduate studies and preparation of doctoral dissertations; vi) introduction of the topic into university students' curricula, initially, in the form of extracurricular activity such as invited lectures delivered by experts from the same country and abroad, publication of textbooks and manuals, summer schools, etc. ; vii) creation and subsequent dynamic development of corresponding paradigms or paradigm circles, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to an original scientometric concept, there is a unity of the institutionalization, interdisciplinarity and internationalization of contemporary science and university education [4,5]. Along with the acknowledged problem-ori-ented denominations of single institutions of different organizational type, the following essential components belong to science institutionalization defined as a historically established disciplinary organization of scientific and higher educational structures [5][6][7]: i) the organization of national and international scientific forums on a concrete interdisciplinary (or narrow-monodisciplinary) topic; ii) the regular publication of problem-oriented and narrow-or broad-profile inter-or monodisciplinary journals and monographs and their subsequent inclusion in secondary information sources and databases; iii) foundation of national and international scientific societies and associations; iv) establishing of corresponding university departments and/or their subdivisions performing a regular students' education; v) introduction of postgraduate studies and preparation of doctoral dissertations; vi) introduction of the topic into university students' curricula, initially, in the form of extracurricular activity such as invited lectures delivered by experts from the same country and abroad, publication of textbooks and manuals, summer schools, etc. ; vii) creation and subsequent dynamic development of corresponding paradigms or paradigm circles, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%