2020
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2020.1844579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scientometric review on literature of macroprudential policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no consensus on the definition of systemic financial risk. It is thus necessary to further explore systemic risk (Tang et al, 2021). Adrian and Brunnermeier (2016) defined systemic financial risk as the risk of the intermediation capacity of the entire financial system malfunctioning, which would result in potentially adverse consequences for the supply of credit to the real economy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no consensus on the definition of systemic financial risk. It is thus necessary to further explore systemic risk (Tang et al, 2021). Adrian and Brunnermeier (2016) defined systemic financial risk as the risk of the intermediation capacity of the entire financial system malfunctioning, which would result in potentially adverse consequences for the supply of credit to the real economy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Как следует из наукоемкого обзора литературы [1], в последние годы наблюдается рост научного интереса к проблемам эффективности макропруденциальной политики центральных банков. Это связано с тем, что качественная макропруденциальная политика способна обеспечить финансовую стабильность и тем самым создать условия для экономического роста [2].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Table 1 Last Published Papers using scientometric analysis, networks theory, or literature analysis through database focused on the economics of sustainability and climate change [ [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%