2021
DOI: 10.21061/see.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scoping Literature Review of Engineering Thriving to Redefine Student Success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, culture is co-created by all members of a group and future studies that include graduate student, faculty, and staff perspectives may enhance our understanding of how these expectations and norms develop and are reinforced by all members of an organization. In addition to understanding how we might dismantle the notions of a culture of high stress and poor self-care, future work that develops interventions to support a culture of wellness in engineering (Jensen, 2021 ) will support student thriving (Ge et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, culture is co-created by all members of a group and future studies that include graduate student, faculty, and staff perspectives may enhance our understanding of how these expectations and norms develop and are reinforced by all members of an organization. In addition to understanding how we might dismantle the notions of a culture of high stress and poor self-care, future work that develops interventions to support a culture of wellness in engineering (Jensen, 2021 ) will support student thriving (Ge et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These perceptions can manage the components of education curriculums centered on distinguishing living principles and objectives whereas simultaneously encouraging comfort [12]. Flourishing incorporates manifold aspects of triumph, encompasses recurrent activities of development and adjustment, and entails of harmonious capabilities that ought to preferably be reviewed together [13]. In the case of the present study, success carries a much simpler definition as it merely encompasses the ability to be pursue studying at the tertiary level when many of the Orang Asli have failed.…”
Section:  Issn: 2252-8822mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, if you apply a pipeline paradigm and focus on student retention, students who are attracted to majors outside of engineering are often seen as identical to those who leave because of poor academic performance. If you apply a pathway paradigm and focus on student persistence, students who are thriving in engineering (Gesun et al, 2021) are often seen as identical to those who never reach their full potential or who have negative experiences, as long as they continue along engineering pathways (W. C. Lee, 2019). In short, if the field of engineering education allows quantitative metrics to overly influence the direction of analysis, the only experiences emphasized will be those that can be empirically linked to quantifiable student outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%