2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scoping review of the scientific evidence base for rewilding in Europe

Emma E. Hart,
Amy Haigh,
Simone Ciuti
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if the science of rewilding is discussed, it is criticized for being theory-led rather than evidence-based [52]. More than that, the extent to which rewilding can deliver benefits remains uncertain [3].…”
Section: Rewilding Between Benefits and Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, if the science of rewilding is discussed, it is criticized for being theory-led rather than evidence-based [52]. More than that, the extent to which rewilding can deliver benefits remains uncertain [3].…”
Section: Rewilding Between Benefits and Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing typologies of functional types of animals within bioregions of trait space would help operationalize the rewilding concept on a global scale [59]. Implementing comprehensive long-term plans to manage herbivore populations will maximize biodiversity gains, mitigating welfare concerns and reputational risks [52].…”
Section: Rewilding Challenges and Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations