Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1097047.1097063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A search result clustering method using informatively named entities

Abstract: Clustering the results of a search helps the user to overview the information returned. In this paper, we regard the clustering task as indexing the search results. Here, an index means a structured label list that can makes it easier for the user to comprehend the labels and search results. To realize this goal, we make three proposals. First is to use Named Entity Extraction for term extraction. Second is a new label selecting criterion based on importance in the search result and the relation between terms … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed techniques include using hyperlinks [Wang and Kitsuregawa 2002], named entities [Toda and Kataoka 2005], external information available on the Internet [Gabrilovich 2006], and temporal attributes [Alonso and Gertz 2006].…”
Section: Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed techniques include using hyperlinks [Wang and Kitsuregawa 2002], named entities [Toda and Kataoka 2005], external information available on the Internet [Gabrilovich 2006], and temporal attributes [Alonso and Gertz 2006].…”
Section: Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several state-of-the-art approaches to improve the automatic generation of clusters have been proposed in the literature [20,2,16,6,14]. The LUPI (Learning Using Privileged Information) paradigm, proposed by Vapnik and Vashist [21] to incorporate privileged information in the classification task, was applied to the clustering task in [6] and [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], Toda and Kataoka proposed a method for clustering the results from search engines by using named entities for building an index of results (a structured labeled list). The algorithm proposed by them consists of the following steps: 1) Find the search results, 2) List the named entities for the search results, 3) Select the labels of the list of named entities, 4) Arrange the labels for categories of named entities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of web document clustering [13,14], objects are replaced by documents and are grouped together based upon some measure like similarity of content or of hyperlinked structure. As discussed earlier, most of the search engines return a large and unmanageable list of documents containing the query keywords.…”
Section: Document Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%