2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11562-017-0395-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A second look at invisibility: Al-Ghayb, Islam, ethnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a wish comes true, devotees must keep their promise or fear the saint’s retribution. In considering the saint as a non-human agent, invisible but present, the devotees’ rituals involve an epistemological and ontological play with frames of reference, dwelling on the boundaries of what is real and imaginary (Bubandt et al., 2017; Kreinath, 2014; Luhrmann, 2012; Shapiro, 2016).…”
Section: Transfigurations Of Hızır and Fractal Dynamics In Rituals Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a wish comes true, devotees must keep their promise or fear the saint’s retribution. In considering the saint as a non-human agent, invisible but present, the devotees’ rituals involve an epistemological and ontological play with frames of reference, dwelling on the boundaries of what is real and imaginary (Bubandt et al., 2017; Kreinath, 2014; Luhrmann, 2012; Shapiro, 2016).…”
Section: Transfigurations Of Hızır and Fractal Dynamics In Rituals Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this remark should not be taken as the deployment of Orientalist tropes about the rationality of Western modernity versus the mysticism of its alternatives. Rather, as Bubandt et al (2017) contend, bringing the mystical into the visual field can challenge 'not only the monopoly of modern science and rationality of visuality, but also the authorities in the very context from which they grew'. Thus, invisibility is not necessarily something to be overcome through technology or information sharing; it is precisely what co-constitutes what is seen by drone operators, human rights organisations, local authorities, people on the ground, and global audiences.…”
Section: Contesting the Scopic Regimes Of Modernity: Aesthetic Intervmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What avenues, then, are opened by Chishty’s art to further decolonise the scopic regimes of modernity? If the aporia of vision is that what is seen is reliant on what cannot be seen — that is, the invisible distinguishes the visible — Nils Bubandt et al (2017) suggest that while this dynamic may be central to the scopic regimes of Western modernity, there are other ways to negotiate it. They focus on the concept of al-ghayb within Islam, which refers to the hidden, the unseen, and the invisible, which co-constitutes the visible rather than serving as its outer limit.…”
Section: Contesting the Scopic Regimes Of Modernity: Aesthetic Intervmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fernando pushes us to think about a “true post‐humanism” that entails the possibility of modes of existence not immediately accessible, or even completely inaccessible, to our common sensory perception. Engaging ethnographically with relations with such immaterial beings—including but not limited to jinni, saints, and God (El‐Aswad 2010; Mittermaier 2010, 2019; Suhr 2015; Taneja 2017; Bubandt, Rytter, and Suhr 2019; Schielke 2019)—is not only essential to understanding diverse modes of Muslim religiosity but further “destabilizes the distinction between the material and immaterial, natural and supernatural” (Bubandt 2018, 7–8) that underlies much anthropological scholarship. Doing so pushes the study of human–non‐human entanglements beyond its materialist biases (Fernando 2017) to consider the possibilities of extra‐secular “becomings” (Haraway 2008), ways of becoming attuned, encountering, and living in a relational context with immaterial as well as material beings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%