2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-022-01264-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A second-order dynamical system for equilibrium problems

Abstract: We consider a second order dynamical system for solving equilibrium problems in Hilbert spaces. Under mild conditions, we prove existence and uniqueness of strong global solution of the proposed dynamical system. We establish the exponential convergence of trajectories under strong pseudo monotonicity and Lipschitz-type conditions. We then investigate a discrete version of the second order dynamical system, which leads to a fixed point type algorithm with inertial effect and relaxation. The linear convergence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the proximal operator is mostly considered in the literature with respect to the whole underlying space, in papers such as [7,17,18] it is taken on a certain set. The same algorithm has been proposed for solving (EP) in [24] (of which we became aware only when this paper was complete, hence the possible redundancies) as a relaxed inertial extragradient method and [48], via an explicit discretization of a second-order dynamical system, under different hypotheses that include the convexity of f in the second variable. Even if this is not explicitly acknowledged, in these works the proximal operator is considered with respect to the underlying set of (EP), too.…”
Section: Rmk:ep1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Even though the proximal operator is mostly considered in the literature with respect to the whole underlying space, in papers such as [7,17,18] it is taken on a certain set. The same algorithm has been proposed for solving (EP) in [24] (of which we became aware only when this paper was complete, hence the possible redundancies) as a relaxed inertial extragradient method and [48], via an explicit discretization of a second-order dynamical system, under different hypotheses that include the convexity of f in the second variable. Even if this is not explicitly acknowledged, in these works the proximal operator is considered with respect to the underlying set of (EP), too.…”
Section: Rmk:ep1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) In virtue of relations (3.2) and (3.4), K should be assumed to be an affine subspace and not only as a closed and convex set. We note that the authors in [2,3,16,35] considered their algorithms on the whole space, while in [24,48] K was taken closed and convex, however the issue of staying feasible after the extrapolation step does not seem to have been taken into consideration.…”
Section: Rmk:ep1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This research direction has become increasingly attractive as it can provide new insights into optimization results and lead to interesting findings. Among the emerging research directions, there is a line of works that uses ordinary differential equations (ODEs) to design algorithms for optimization problems [2,3,9,14], variational inequalities [18,27,34,43], monotone inclusions [1,5,6], fixed point problems [15,17] and equilibrium problems [20,36,42,45]. Using ODE interpretation not only provides a better understanding of Nesterov's scheme, but also helps design new schemes with similar convergence rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%