2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A second order penalized direct forcing for hybrid Cartesian/immersed boundary flow simulations

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a second order penalized direct forcing method to deal with fluidstructure interaction problems involving complex static or time-varying geometries. As this work constitutes a first step toward more complicated problems, our developments are restricted to Dirichlet boundary condition in purely hydraulic context. The proposed method belongs to the class of immersed boundary techniques and consists in immersing the physical domain in a Cartesian fictitious one of simpler geometry on fix… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some perspectives can be outlined about the improvement of this numerical model in order to proceed to the geometry optimization of the design of the flow-limiter fins. In particular, we can mentioned the space-interpolation scheme across the boundary interface to reach the second order [18] and the definition of immersed-wall laws for RANS/large-eddy simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some perspectives can be outlined about the improvement of this numerical model in order to proceed to the geometry optimization of the design of the flow-limiter fins. In particular, we can mentioned the space-interpolation scheme across the boundary interface to reach the second order [18] and the definition of immersed-wall laws for RANS/large-eddy simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us notice that for Dirichlet boundary conditions and elliptic problems, the theoretical rate of convergence in space of the Q 1 -finite element method with non-boundary-fitted meshes is O(h 1 ) in L 2 (Ω) norm, with h the space step [17]. As a whole, contributions to the validation of this IB approach can be found in [8] and [18]. On one side, in the context of dilatable two-phase flow elliptic problems, the work mentioned in [8] validates the ISI method with respect to body-fitted finite-element computations and to the JEBC method (an IB method using a finite-volume discretization).…”
Section: Convergence Order and Elements Of Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, most of published methods do not reach second order accuracy in space. To the author's knowledge, the Sub-Mesh Penalty Method of Sarthou et al [16], the second order Penalty model of Introïni et al [17], and the work of Chantalat et al [18] are the only models based on penalisation which offer improvements to tackle the rasterisation effect on Cartesian grids. In addition, the active zone for the forcing term is generally also diffused by the use of mask functions combined with Heaviside functions, as it is the case in [19] and in [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As animals forage following odor traces, this technique can potentially be attractive for insect flight simulations as well. An interesting recent development has been proposed in [13] in the context of finite-difference discretizations. Their idea is to modify the fractional step projection scheme such that the Neumann boundary condition, as introduced in [15], appears in the pressure Poisson equation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%