“…There have been varying degrees of optimism and pessimism on this possibility [10,33]. Much of this has to do with issues of improving trade relations and investment opportunities, improving and utilizing energy resources, better environmental cooperation and economic aid as well as encouraging cultural exchanges such as inter-Korean family reunions.…”
Section: Hedley Bull International Society and East Asiamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However these domestic constraints are not necessarily a fetter on a states' international commitments. Through Bull's work these informal international commitments which whilst not being legally binding or institutionalised per se, are, nevertheless, a declaration of intent and an 'endgame' [10]. Moreover, if these commitments were to be rejected then a states' reputation and ultimately its national interests would be harmed.…”
Section: Hedley Bull International Society and East Asiamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reaction from the surrounding states implied that such a declaration breached the codes of agreement that six party talks would help with regional peace and security. 10 This has been a familiar pattern of crisis escalation and crisis resolution behaviour [20].…”
Section: Reinterpreting the 2010 Inter-korean Crisesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Six Party states also set the conditions for the development of developing long term peaceful nuclear technology and the de-nuclearisation of the Korean peninsula through the normalisation of bi-lateral and multi-lateral diplomatic relations. There are also recent calls for an increase of trade and economic cooperation with the possibility of building mutual trust and a 'spillover' of soft power into the security arena [10,23]. For instance the February 2007 Joint Declaration of the Six Party nations echoes the conscious and intended evolution of mutual trust through a 'word for word' commitment and 'action for action' commitment [9].…”
Section: Reinterpreting the 2010 Inter-korean Crisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed China seems to be hoping that North Korea will follow its lead in establishing its own new model of economic development and trade with neighbours [30]. This might in turn impact on the geopolitical relations of the region [10]. Japan and Russia are concerned with a unified Korean peninsula under Western influence but want stability for trade and natural resource access of which North Korea has an abundance.…”
Section: Framing the Debate: Neorealism And Contemporary Inter-koreanmentioning
The year 2010 witnessed an escalation of tensions on the Korean peninsula through two military crises. The rise in tensions can be explained by neorealism as a shifting distribution of power in the region and a small state preserving its national security. The paper argues that neorealism is not sufficient to explain the patterns and routines of crisis escalation and crisis resumption on the Korean peninsula and the North East Asian region. By focusing on the causes of conflicts neorealism fails to identify the consequences of these inter-state tensions for the evolution of an anarchical society of states in the North East Asian region. The paper provides an alternative interpretation of recent inter-Korean crisis escalation and crisis resolution in the East Asian region through the work of Hedley Bull.
“…There have been varying degrees of optimism and pessimism on this possibility [10,33]. Much of this has to do with issues of improving trade relations and investment opportunities, improving and utilizing energy resources, better environmental cooperation and economic aid as well as encouraging cultural exchanges such as inter-Korean family reunions.…”
Section: Hedley Bull International Society and East Asiamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However these domestic constraints are not necessarily a fetter on a states' international commitments. Through Bull's work these informal international commitments which whilst not being legally binding or institutionalised per se, are, nevertheless, a declaration of intent and an 'endgame' [10]. Moreover, if these commitments were to be rejected then a states' reputation and ultimately its national interests would be harmed.…”
Section: Hedley Bull International Society and East Asiamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reaction from the surrounding states implied that such a declaration breached the codes of agreement that six party talks would help with regional peace and security. 10 This has been a familiar pattern of crisis escalation and crisis resolution behaviour [20].…”
Section: Reinterpreting the 2010 Inter-korean Crisesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Six Party states also set the conditions for the development of developing long term peaceful nuclear technology and the de-nuclearisation of the Korean peninsula through the normalisation of bi-lateral and multi-lateral diplomatic relations. There are also recent calls for an increase of trade and economic cooperation with the possibility of building mutual trust and a 'spillover' of soft power into the security arena [10,23]. For instance the February 2007 Joint Declaration of the Six Party nations echoes the conscious and intended evolution of mutual trust through a 'word for word' commitment and 'action for action' commitment [9].…”
Section: Reinterpreting the 2010 Inter-korean Crisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed China seems to be hoping that North Korea will follow its lead in establishing its own new model of economic development and trade with neighbours [30]. This might in turn impact on the geopolitical relations of the region [10]. Japan and Russia are concerned with a unified Korean peninsula under Western influence but want stability for trade and natural resource access of which North Korea has an abundance.…”
Section: Framing the Debate: Neorealism And Contemporary Inter-koreanmentioning
The year 2010 witnessed an escalation of tensions on the Korean peninsula through two military crises. The rise in tensions can be explained by neorealism as a shifting distribution of power in the region and a small state preserving its national security. The paper argues that neorealism is not sufficient to explain the patterns and routines of crisis escalation and crisis resumption on the Korean peninsula and the North East Asian region. By focusing on the causes of conflicts neorealism fails to identify the consequences of these inter-state tensions for the evolution of an anarchical society of states in the North East Asian region. The paper provides an alternative interpretation of recent inter-Korean crisis escalation and crisis resolution in the East Asian region through the work of Hedley Bull.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.