2020
DOI: 10.1017/qua.2019.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sediment-mixing process model of till genesis, using texture and clay mineralogy data from Saginaw lobe (Michigan, USA) tills

Abstract: We present a sediment-mixing process model of till genesis based on data from surface tills of the Saginaw lobe terrain in lower Michigan. Our research uses a spatial approach to understanding glacial landsystems and till genesis. We sampled calcareous till at 336 upland sites and at 17 sites in lacustrine sediment of the Saginaw Lake plain. The loamy tills have bimodal grain-size curves, with a fine-texture mode near the silt–clay boundary and a sand mode. Spatial grouping analysis suggests that tills can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each glossic horizon group sample, a minimum of five subsamples were analyzed and the mean was considered the representative textural “signature” for that group. Because laser diffractometry tends to underestimate the clay content and overestimate the silt fraction (Eshel et al., 2004; Fisher et al., 2017; Konert & Vandenberghe, 1997; Yang et al., 2019), we defined the clay‐silt textural break at 8 μm, as guided by recent studies reported in Michigan (Nyland et al., 2018; Schaetzl, Baish, et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each glossic horizon group sample, a minimum of five subsamples were analyzed and the mean was considered the representative textural “signature” for that group. Because laser diffractometry tends to underestimate the clay content and overestimate the silt fraction (Eshel et al., 2004; Fisher et al., 2017; Konert & Vandenberghe, 1997; Yang et al., 2019), we defined the clay‐silt textural break at 8 μm, as guided by recent studies reported in Michigan (Nyland et al., 2018; Schaetzl, Baish, et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%