Perspectives in Computational Complexity 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05446-9_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Selection of Lower Bounds for Arithmetic Circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result also holds for homogeneous depth four circuits. The known Ω(2 n 1/2 log n ) lower bounds for the restricted versions of these circuits [53] do not imply any nontrivial result for NNL for explicit varieties. Thus there is a sharp phase transition in the difficulty of the lower bound problem in this model at the exponent 1/2.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A similar result also holds for homogeneous depth four circuits. The known Ω(2 n 1/2 log n ) lower bounds for the restricted versions of these circuits [53] do not imply any nontrivial result for NNL for explicit varieties. Thus there is a sharp phase transition in the difficulty of the lower bound problem in this model at the exponent 1/2.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since we use polynomials to construct k-independent (almost) universal hash functions, we must prove their concrete optimality in cWRAM evaluations. However, all concrete optimality results for polynomial evaluation are known only over infinite (e.g., rational) fields [9], and the gap between these bounds and the lower bounds over finite fields (e.g., Z p ) is very large [35]. Furthermore, optimality is obtained using only two operations (i.e., +, ×) and cannot hold in computation models with large instruction sets like the cWRAM and real processors.…”
Section: B Proving Optimality Of Universal Hash Functions In Cwrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the only operations allowed for polynomial evaluation are the addition and multiplication, Horner rule's bound of 2d operations for degree-d polynomials was shown to be uniquely optimal in one-time evaluations [9], [61]. However, this bound does not hold in finite fields, where the minimum number of modular additions and multiplications is Ω( (d + 1)) [35]. Furthermore, these bounds do not hold in any WRAM models or any real computer where many more operations are implemented by the ISA.…”
Section: B Polynomial Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, it is known that there is no sub-exponential family of monotone circuits for the permanent. This was first shown for the field of real numbers [17] and a proof for general fields, with a suitably adapted notion of monotonicity is given in [18]. An exponential lower bound for the permanent is also known for depth-3 arithmetic circuits [15] for all finite fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%