2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-adaptive binary differential evolution algorithm for large scale binary optimization problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In mutation stage, several DE trial vector generation strategies have been proposed. Well-known mutation strategies were listed in [21,22]. One of the DE mutation strategies in the literature defined as follows:…”
Section: Differential Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mutation stage, several DE trial vector generation strategies have been proposed. Well-known mutation strategies were listed in [21,22]. One of the DE mutation strategies in the literature defined as follows:…”
Section: Differential Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, apart from the algorithms used in this study, the results of solving CEC2015 test suit obtained from efficient binary artificial bee colony algorithm based on genetic operator (GBABC), binary quantum-inspired gravitational search algorithm (BQIGSA), and self-adaptive binary variant of a differential evolution algorithm (SabDE) as reported in [53] are also included in the comparison. From Table 2, the mean (Mean) and standard deviation (STD) values of the objective functions are used to measure the search convergence and consistency of the algorithms.…”
Section: Cec2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 9, the best performers are UMDA, BPSO, GA, PBIL, and EDACE, which obtain the same mean values while, for 13, the best performers are UMDA, BPSO, GA, PBIL, BSA, and EDACE, which obtained the same mean values. It should be noted that the results from [53] were obtained from using the total number of function evaluations as 1,000,000 with the binary length of 50 for each design variable whereas this work uses 10,000 function evaluations with the binary length of 5 for each design variable. This indirect comparison with GBABC, BQIGSA, and SabDE can only be used to show that the proposed EDACE also has good performance and cannot be used to claim which method is superior.…”
Section: Cec2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, most metaheuristics were designed for a continuous search space. A binary search space poses the problem of discontinuity and non-differentiability, which makes it difficult to use classical deterministic optimization methods [9]. In binary problems, it is required to reduce the number of possible states to binary solutions.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%