“…For 9, the best performers are UMDA, BPSO, GA, PBIL, and EDACE, which obtain the same mean values while, for 13, the best performers are UMDA, BPSO, GA, PBIL, BSA, and EDACE, which obtained the same mean values. It should be noted that the results from [53] were obtained from using the total number of function evaluations as 1,000,000 with the binary length of 50 for each design variable whereas this work uses 10,000 function evaluations with the binary length of 5 for each design variable. This indirect comparison with GBABC, BQIGSA, and SabDE can only be used to show that the proposed EDACE also has good performance and cannot be used to claim which method is superior.…”