2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11020204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self-Calibrated Non-Parametric Time Series Analysis Approach for Assessing Insect Defoliation of Broad-Leaved Deciduous Nothofagus pumilio Forests

Abstract: Folivorous insects cause some of the most ecologically and economically important disturbances in forests worldwide. For this reason, several approaches have been developed to exploit the temporal richness of available satellite time series data to detect and quantify insect forest defoliation. Current approaches rely on parametric functions to describe the natural annual phenological cycle of the forest, from which anomalies are calculated and used to assess defoliation. Quantification of the natural variabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although O. amphimone is polyphagous and feeds upon a variety of native and introduced plant species, it has more frequently been observed feeding in N. pumilio than in other species (Paritsis et al., ). Outbreaks of O. amphimone can cause complete tree defoliation over vast areas (hundreds of hectares) of N. pumilio forests when episodes are severe (Paritsis et al., ; Piper et al., ; Chávez et al., ). The fourth and fifth instars are the most damaging stages, causing ~90% of the total foliage consumption (Paritsis et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although O. amphimone is polyphagous and feeds upon a variety of native and introduced plant species, it has more frequently been observed feeding in N. pumilio than in other species (Paritsis et al., ). Outbreaks of O. amphimone can cause complete tree defoliation over vast areas (hundreds of hectares) of N. pumilio forests when episodes are severe (Paritsis et al., ; Piper et al., ; Chávez et al., ). The fourth and fifth instars are the most damaging stages, causing ~90% of the total foliage consumption (Paritsis et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In southern South America, massive outbreaks of the caterpillar Ormiscodes amphimone (Saturniidae) are recurrent in Nothofagus forests (Veblen et al., ; Paritsis and Veblen, 2010a; Paritsis et al., ; Chávez et al., ). Landscape assessments for two sites in Argentinian Patagonia report higher defoliation severity in forests of the winter deciduous species N. pumilio than in those of N. antarctica (also winter deciduous) and N. betuloides (evergreen) (Paritsis et al., ); these patterns may reflect either site or host‐specific effects (Garibaldi et al., 2011a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each spatial scale, we reconstructed the annual phenological cycle using a non-parametric approach implemented in the "npphen" R package [33]. This tool has proven to be effective for studying vegetation phenological metrics using large remote sensing datasets [34][35][36][37]. With npphen, all NDVI observations ( Figure 5a) are arranged by the phenological year (from July to the following June for the Southern Hemisphere) (Figure 5b).…”
Section: Time-series Analysis and Productivity Assessment At Differenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, our anomaly is defined as the distance between the observed and the expected EVI value for a given DGS. Positive anomalies indicate a “greening” of the vegetated land surface (EVI increment), while negative anomalies indicate a “browning” (EVI drop). To evaluate the precision of the outbreak detection, the probability that the observed anomaly being a “true” anomaly is calculated from the KDE (Chávez et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the precision of the outbreak detection, the probability that the observed anomaly being a "true" anomaly is calculated from the KDE (Chávez et al, 2019). This is an iterative leave-one-out process where all GS's are left out one by one and the expected EVI value curve is calculated using the rest of the GS's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%