2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-calibration scheme for two-dimensional free-form probing measurement under the assumption of rigid-body machine kinematic model

Shota Onishi,
Soichi Ibaraki,
Masashi Yamaguchi
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because self-calibration methods require the probed points being in a closed set, as the workpiece is rotated or translated. Onishi et al [360] extended their applications to arbitrary 2D geometries, by assuming that the machine's positioning error is in accordance with the rigid-body quasi-static kinematic model reviewed in Section 4.1. The linear axis error motions are unknown variables to be identified, and they are in a closed set, as the object rotates.…”
Section: ) Self-calibration For Indirect Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because self-calibration methods require the probed points being in a closed set, as the workpiece is rotated or translated. Onishi et al [360] extended their applications to arbitrary 2D geometries, by assuming that the machine's positioning error is in accordance with the rigid-body quasi-static kinematic model reviewed in Section 4.1. The linear axis error motions are unknown variables to be identified, and they are in a closed set, as the object rotates.…”
Section: ) Self-calibration For Indirect Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%