2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-consistent approach to the quadrupole dynamics of medium heavy nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
102
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is done according to the distribution of the angular momentum projection K quantum number defined in Eq. (26).…”
Section: Illustrative Calculations: the Gadolinium Isotopic Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is done according to the distribution of the angular momentum projection K quantum number defined in Eq. (26).…”
Section: Illustrative Calculations: the Gadolinium Isotopic Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the perturbative limit for the Thouless-Valatin masses, and the corresponding expressions for ZPE corrections. This approximation was applied in recent studies using models based both on the Gogny interaction [25], and Skyrme energy density functionals [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a Gaussian overlap approximation of GCM, the collective Hamiltonian with parameters determined by selfconsistent mean-field calculations is much simple in numerical calculations, and has achieved great success in description of nuclear low-lying states [46][47][48][49][50] and impurity effect of Λ hyperon in nuclear collective excitation [51]. In particular, a systematic study of low-lying states for a large set of even-even nuclei has been carried out with the Gogny D1S force mapped collective Hamiltonian and good overall agreement with the low-lying spectroscopic data has been achieved [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as shown in several studies [29], the Thouless-Valatin corrections are almost independent of deformation, and the effective moments of inertia to be used in the collective Hamiltonian can simply be obtained by renormalizing the Inglis-Belyaev values by a constant factor, characteristic for a given nucleus. The situation is considerably more complicated in the case of mass parameters [35,36], for which there are no simple estimates of the Thouless-Valatin correction, especially for nuclei with γ-soft potential energy surfaces. Some authors [36] argue that, to approximately take into account the Thouless-Valatin correction, all inertial functions, not only the moments of inertia, should be rescaled by a constant multiplicative factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%