Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) represent a relatively new institutional model for devolved, locally-led conservation in Tanzania, in which local villages set aside part of their land for wildlife conservation and manage that resource collectively, so that their stakeholder communities can collectively leverage economic and social benefits from income-generating activities like tourism. This study examines the relationship between community-defined land use plans and de facto land use practices, and the influence of the latter on the relative abundance and distribution of large wild mammals in a across the Ifakara-Lupiro-Mangula (ILUMA) WMA, which acts as a key buffer zone between Nyerere National Park (NNP) to the east and adjacent stakeholder villages to the north and west. All observed signs of wildlife and human activity were recorded across 32 locations inside ILUMA and in the permanent settlements and national park that respectively border it to the west and east. Across much of ILUMA WMA, in areas where agreed land use plans were not adhered to, rampant cattle herding and land clearing for agriculture were associated with reductions in wildlife richness and biodiversity, as well as overall ecosystem integrity. Although human settlement was also generally associated with reduced natural ecosystem integrity, some important exceptions to this rule illustrate how sustainable livelihoods for local people that are based on well-managed natural resource harvesting practices may actually enhance conservation effectiveness: Three authorised human settlements within the WMA, where fishing was the primary permitted livelihood and local communities collaborated with the WMA management, were surrounded by pristine land cover with thriving terrestrial wildlife populations. Correspondingly, the best conserved parts of the WMA not only included those closest to the boundary with the national park to the east, but also these fishing villages along the riverbank to the north, where compliance with agreed land use plans was most rigorous. Overall, this study documents a useful example of how a devolved conservation area may conditionally host resident local communities undertaking selective natural resource extraction activities and collaborate with them to achieve effective de facto conservation practices.
Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs) represent a relatively new institutional model for devolved, locally-led conservation in Tanzania, in which local villages set aside part of their land for wildlife conservation and manage that resource collectively, so that their stakeholder communities can collectively leverage economic and social benefits from income-generating activities like tourism. This study examines the relationship between community-defined land use plans and de facto land use practices, and the influence of the latter on the relative abundance and distribution of large wild mammals in a across the Ifakara-Lupiro-Mangula (ILUMA) WMA, which acts as a key buffer zone between Nyerere National Park (NNP) to the east and adjacent stakeholder villages to the north and west. All observed signs of wildlife and human activity were recorded across 32 locations inside ILUMA and in the permanent settlements and national park that respectively border it to the west and east. Across much of ILUMA WMA, in areas where agreed land use plans were not adhered to, rampant cattle herding and land clearing for agriculture were associated with reductions in wildlife richness and biodiversity, as well as overall ecosystem integrity. Although human settlement was also generally associated with reduced natural ecosystem integrity, some important exceptions to this rule illustrate how sustainable livelihoods for local people that are based on well-managed natural resource harvesting practices may actually enhance conservation effectiveness: Three authorised human settlements within the WMA, where fishing was the primary permitted livelihood and local communities collaborated with the WMA management, were surrounded by pristine land cover with thriving terrestrial wildlife populations. Correspondingly, the best conserved parts of the WMA not only included those closest to the boundary with the national park to the east, but also these fishing villages along the riverbank to the north, where compliance with agreed land use plans was most rigorous. Overall, this study documents a useful example of how a devolved conservation area may conditionally host resident local communities undertaking selective natural resource extraction activities and collaborate with them to achieve effective de facto conservation practices.
The dual-specialized behavioural adaptions ofAnopheles arabiensis, to feed readily upon either people or cattle, enable it to thrive and mediate persistent residual malaria transmission across much of Africa, despite widespread use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). Indeed, LLIN scale up has often resulted in it dominating the more efficient but vulnerable malaria vectorAnopheles gambiae, its sibling species within a complex of the latter name. However, the feeding behaviours and competitive relationships ofAn. arabiensiswith other sibling species in well conserved natural ecosystems, where its known preferred hosts are scarce or absent, remain largely unexplored.Potential aquatic habitats were surveyed forAn. gambiaecomplex larvae across a gradient of natural ecosystem integrity in southern Tanzania, encompassing fully domesticated human settlements, a partially encroached Wildlife Management Area (WMA), and well conserved areas of the recently gazetted Nyerere National Park (NNP) before substantive development of tourist access or accommodation. Direct observations, tracks, spoor and other signs of human, livestock or wild animal activity around these water bodies were recorded as indirect indicators of potential blood source availability.While onlyAn. arabiensiswas found in fully domesticated ecosystems, its non-vector sibling speciesAn. quadriannulatusoccurred in conserved areas and dominated the most intact natural ecosystems. Proportions of larvae identified asAn. arabiensiswere positively associated with human and/or cattle activity and negatively associated with distance inside NNP and away from human settlements. Proportions ofAn. quadriannulatuswere positively associated with activities of impala and bushpig, implicating both as likely preferred blood hosts. While abundant impala and lack of humans or cattle in intact acacia savannah within NNP apparently allowed it to dominateAn. arabiensis, presence of bushpig seemed to provide it with a foothold in miombo woodlands of the WMA, despite encroachment by people and livestock. While this antelope and suid are essentially unrelated, both are non- migratory residents of small home ranges with perennial surface water, representing preferred hosts forAn. quadriannulatusthat are widespread across extensive natural ecosystems all year round.Despite dominance ofAn. quadriannulatusin well-conserved areas,An. arabiensiswas even found in absolutely intact environments >40km inside NNP, suggesting it can survive on blood from one or more unidentified wild species. While self-sustaining refuge populations ofAn. arabiensisinside conservation areas, supported by wild blood hosts that are fundamentally beyond the reach of insecticidal interventions targeted at humans or their livestock, may confound efforts to eliminate this key malaria vector, they might also enable insecticide resistance management strategies that could restore the effectiveness of pyrethroids in particular.
Understanding mosquito vector behaviour, abundance, and bionomics is crucial for effective malaria prevention. Since most malaria parasites in humans are strict anthroponoses, mosquito preference for humans as a blood source is a key determinant of transmission intensity and intervention strategies. This study compares the attraction ofAnopheles arabiensisandAnopheles quadriannulatusto humans by assessing their relative abundance in larval samples and adult mosquito catches using unbaited and human-baited traps.The research investigated how the abundance of these sibling species varies with the local availability of humans, livestock, and wildlife as potential blood sources. Surveys of larval and adult mosquito populations were conducted at 40 mobile camping locations distributed across a landscape mosaic of different habitat types, with a gradient of land use practices ranging from comprehensive conversion to agriculture and human settlement to essentially intact natural ecosystems inside well-protected conservation areas. Larvae were collected from all accessible water bodies within a 2 km radius of each mobile camp, while adults were surveyed using four light traps and one interception netting barrier trap at each camp. Light traps were strategically placed at locations such as beside a human-occupied tent, near the camp, in a nearby streambed, and in an open natural glade, while the netting barrier trap was placed in the open natural glade.Most adultAnopheles gambiaecomplex mosquitoes caught were unfed and presumably host-seeking. The mean catches of the complex in light traps next to the human-occupied tent was over four times higher than elsewhere around the camp (p<<0.0001). Catches decreased with distance from humans, suggesting attraction to humans by at least one species in the complex.An. arabiensiswas caught in greater numbers in the human-occupied tent, whileAn. quadriannulatuscatches remained consistently low across all traps, even in wild areas where it was dominant in larval population. The proportion ofAn. arabiensisin adult collections was higher than in larval samples (98.7% versus. 78.3%, p<<0.0001), and adults caught beside human-occupied tents had 36 times higher odds of beingAn. arabiensisrather thanAn. quadriannulatus. Similarly, the barrier trap away from humans but frequently visited by researchers showed a 24-fold enrichment ofAn. arabiensis.These results confirm the strong attraction ofAn. arabiensisto humans, contrasting with the non-vectorAn. quadriannulatus, which is largely unresponsive to humans. Light traps by human-occupied tents efficiently capture anthropophagic mosquitoes outdoors, while unbaited traps far from people appear to give unbiased representations of larval population composition but with very low efficiency. Moreover, netting barriers with human activity attract anthropophagic mosquitoes, turning them into semi-baited traps with moderate efficiency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.