2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2011.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-coördinating bus route to resist bus bunching

Abstract: The primary challenge for an urban bus system is to maintain constant headways between successive buses. Most bus systems try to achieve this by adherence to a schedule; but this is undermined by the tendency of headways to collapse, so that buses travel in bunches. To counter this, we propose a new method of coördinating buses. Our method abandons the idea of a schedule and even any a priori target headway. Under our scheme headways are dynamically self-equalizing and the natural headway of the system tends t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
138
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, variables h ks should be in seconds or in minutes and therefore integer variables. Preliminary results showed no drastic increment in the computing times when bus holding variables h ks are integer [1,4,6,15].…”
Section: Methodology and Approachmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, variables h ks should be in seconds or in minutes and therefore integer variables. Preliminary results showed no drastic increment in the computing times when bus holding variables h ks are integer [1,4,6,15].…”
Section: Methodology and Approachmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In Daganzo and Pilachowski [5] the authors continuously adjust bus cruising speed based on a cooperative two-way-based approach that considers the headways of the previous and later buses. Bartholdi III and Eisenstein [1] abandon the idea of any a priori target headway, allowing headways to dynamically self-equalize by implementing a simple holding rule at a control point. It is worth noting that the aim of the previously mentioned studies is to maintain headways equally, so they do not consider timetables where the headways may be different for each pair of buses and they are not apt for situations when the buses reach their capacities.…”
Section: State Of the Art Research In Real-time Bus Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Bartholdi and Eisenstein aim to find the most suitable headways for the current situation. The strategy can make the system optimal rather than uniform headway [19]. As the vehicles' seating capacity is limited, as is the tolerance of passengers, most of the studied holding strategies are difficult to apply in practice.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The holding strategy only [19] and stop-skipping only [27] are carried out and the results are compared to the proposed hybrid strategy. The combination of the weighting factors is set as θ 1 : θ 2 : θ 3 " 6 : 3 : 1.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Compared To Other Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical objective of a bus holding strategy is to ensure that the waiting times of passengers at stops do not vary significantly from the planned ones. However, recent works, such as the work of Bartholdi and Eisenstein [10], focused on maintaining even headways between bus trips at the locations of the control point stops without adhering to the planned headway values. Although bus holding can be proved beneficial to bus operations, several works have proposed to introduce limitations on holding strategies because extensive holding of bus trips can cause inconvenience to passengers, overcrowding at stops and "schedule sliding" if the bus trips are postponed due to holding (Delgado et al [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%