1989
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1684(89)90007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self inversive array processing scheme for angle-of-arrival estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases one can use the eigenelement statistics derived under condition (2.2) to establish the statistical behavior of the parameter estimates of interest, even if the set of 5v i 6 i51 n used in the estimation is not guaranteed to satisfy (2.2). (See also [6,7] for a similar observation.) The above invariance property also applies to the ESPRIT algorithm [8] for estimating frequencies and directions-of-arrival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In such cases one can use the eigenelement statistics derived under condition (2.2) to establish the statistical behavior of the parameter estimates of interest, even if the set of 5v i 6 i51 n used in the estimation is not guaranteed to satisfy (2.2). (See also [6,7] for a similar observation.) The above invariance property also applies to the ESPRIT algorithm [8] for estimating frequencies and directions-of-arrival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Indeed, in applications 5v i 6 i51 n are unknown, which means that 5v i 6 cannot be selected to satisfy (2.2). Fortunately, the functions of 5v i 6 i51 n encountered in applications are invariant to the transformation for some a(u) vector (see, e.g., [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]), and it clearly satisfies the aforementioned invariance property. In such cases one can use the eigenelement statistics derived under condition (2.2) to establish the statistical behavior of the parameter estimates of interest, even if the set of 5v i 6 i51 n used in the estimation is not guaranteed to satisfy (2.2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations