2015 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2015.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self-Stabilizing Memory Efficient Algorithm for the Minimum Diameter Spanning Tree under an Omnipotent Daemon

Abstract: Routing protocols are at the core of distributed systems performances, especially in the presence of faults. A classical approach to this problem is to build a spanning tree of the distributed system. Numerous spanning tree construction algorithms depending on the optimized metric exist (total weight, height, distance with respect to a particular process,. . .) both in fault-free and faulty environments. In this paper, we aim at optimizing the diameter of the spanning tree by constructing a minimum diameter sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a huge literature on the self-stabilizing construction of various kinds of trees, including spanning trees (ST) [20], [22], [53], breadth-first search (BFS) trees [1], [3], [18], [24], [30], [42], [48], depth-first search (DFS) trees [21], [23], [24], [43], minimum-weight spanning trees (MST) [13], [17], [39], [41], [51], shortest-path spanning trees [38], [44], minimumdiameter spanning trees [12], minimum-degree spanning trees (MDST) [16], etc. Some of these constructions are even silent, with optimal space-complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a huge literature on the self-stabilizing construction of various kinds of trees, including spanning trees (ST) [20], [22], [53], breadth-first search (BFS) trees [1], [3], [18], [24], [30], [42], [48], depth-first search (DFS) trees [21], [23], [24], [43], minimum-weight spanning trees (MST) [13], [17], [39], [41], [51], shortest-path spanning trees [38], [44], minimumdiameter spanning trees [12], minimum-degree spanning trees (MDST) [16], etc. Some of these constructions are even silent, with optimal space-complexity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, growing and merging trees is the main technique for designing self-stabilizing leader election algorithms in networks, as the leader is often the root of an inward tree [3,4,2,9]. To the best of our knowledge, all algorithms that do not assume a pre-existing leader [3,4,2,8] for tree-construction use Ωplog nq bits per node. This high space-complexity is due to the implementation of two main techniques, used by all algorithms, and recalled below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, growing and merging trees is the main technique for designing self-stabilizing leader election algorithms in networks, as the leader is often the root of an inward tree [3,4,2]. To the best of our knowledge, all algorithms that do not assume a pre-existing leader [3,4,2,10] for tree-construction use Ωplog nq bits per node. This high space-complexity is due to the implementation of two main techniques, used by all algorithms, and recalled below.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%