2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-sustaining synergetic microalgal-bacterial granular sludge process towards energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable municipal wastewater treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fifth, modern methods for wastewater treatment like innovative microalgal-bacterial granular sludge process should be adopted to reduce GHGs emissions. It has been reported that 92.69%, 96.84%, and 87.16% of influent organics, ammonia, and phosphorus, respectively, could be removed in this process [94].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Fifth, modern methods for wastewater treatment like innovative microalgal-bacterial granular sludge process should be adopted to reduce GHGs emissions. It has been reported that 92.69%, 96.84%, and 87.16% of influent organics, ammonia, and phosphorus, respectively, could be removed in this process [94].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As seen, Gammaproteobacteria attributed to Aquimonas, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Thauera, Clostridia attributed to Proteiniclasticum, Acetoanaerobium, Alphaproteobacteria attributed to Rhizobium, Phreatobacter, Psychroglaciecola and Rhodobacter were predominant prokaryotic microbial community, most of which were heterogenetic bacteria that oxidized organic pollutants and produced CO 2 for microalgae [28]. In addition, nitrifying bacteria were not detected in MBGS, and nitrates and nitrites were not found in water, indicating that NH 4 + -N removal was mainly due to microbial assimilation [12]. As such, nutrient removal at daytime was higher than that at night due to O 2 production from microalgal photosynthesis.…”
Section: The Community Structure Of Mbgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it was found that the self-coupled MBGS process could remove respective 92.7%, 96.8%, 84.1% and 87.2% of organic matter, ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen and phosphorus from simulated municipal wastewater under a continuous light condition in 6 h with respective effluent concentrations of 18.3, 0.8, 3.9 and 0.4 mg/L, indicating the excellent potential of the MBGS process [12]. In addition, the MBGS process was highly adaptable to antibiotics and heavy metals in actual wastewater [13,14] thus was extensively used for the treatment of actual municipal wastewater [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The harsh condition of high NaCl concentration might not be conducive to the survival of some microorganism in WAS, which was related to microbial community structure and might lead to shift of dominant bacterial community ( Duan et al, 2016 ). In ecosystem, the functional bacteria distribution is critical to the system functions ( Xin et al, 2015 ; Xu et al, 2018 , 2019 ; Ji et al, 2020 ). In the anaerobic fermentation process, both the biodegradation of dissolved organic matters (DOMs) and the consumption of SCFAs mainly rely on appropriate microbial communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%