2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semantic modeling approach for the automated detection and interpretation of structural damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in-depth information on how to exchange damage data with third party software is not provided in this study. Hamdan et al developed a framework for bridge assessment based on a linked model approach [40]. Such linked models have the disadvantage of data dispersion.…”
Section: Damage Data Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in-depth information on how to exchange damage data with third party software is not provided in this study. Hamdan et al developed a framework for bridge assessment based on a linked model approach [40]. Such linked models have the disadvantage of data dispersion.…”
Section: Damage Data Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several frameworks that generate point clouds and damage information from images and perform FEAs exist [39,40]. However, these models focus on supporting FEA only; other applications or domains have not been considered.…”
Section: Problem Statements and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a data model to exhange damage data with third party software is not defined in this study. Hamdan et al developed a framework for bridge assessment based on a linked model approach [26]. Such linked models have the disadvantage of data dispersion and for later data exchange it is beneficial if all data is stored in a single file.…”
Section: Damage Data Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several frameworks that generate point clouds and damage information from images and perform FEAs exist [26,25]. However, these models focus on supporting FEA only; other applications or domains have not been considered.…”
Section: Problem Statements and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontology-based methods were studied to improve information exchange and maintenance management of bridge networks [14,50], road networks [51], and highway construction inspection [22]. Considering the importance of defect information for infrastructure maintenance, ontologies were investigated to facilitate defect data sharing and management [52,53] as well as automated detection, interpretation and diagnosis of structural damages [54,55]. Additionally, researchers tried to integrate heterogeneous information using semantic web technologies to build decision support systems for highway asset management [56], and urban infrastructure inter-asset management [57].…”
Section: Data Models and Ontologies For Civil Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%