2010
DOI: 10.1080/13658810802570291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semantic registry using a Feature Type Catalogue instead of ontologies to support spatial data infrastructures

Abstract: The use of a semantically rich registry containing a Feature Type Catalogue (FTC) to represent the semantics of geographic feature types including operations, attributes and relationships between feature types is required to realise the benefits of Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs). Specifically, such information provides a more complete representation of the semantics of the concepts used in the SDI, and enables advanced navigation, discovery and utilisation of discovered resources. The presented approach c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method considers the implementation and conceptual aspects of a web service to be distinct. This issue, together with the use of registries to represent web service implementation and invocation details, is discussed in more detail in forthcoming work by the author (Stock et al forthcoming).…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method considers the implementation and conceptual aspects of a web service to be distinct. This issue, together with the use of registries to represent web service implementation and invocation details, is discussed in more detail in forthcoming work by the author (Stock et al forthcoming).…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some existing services provide semantic registration and discovery [13][14][15][16], which is generally implemented in two manners. Integrating semantics into a registry information model (such as ebRIM) using three different methods: (a) mapping from Web Ontology Language (OWL) elements to ebRIM elements using EXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) documents, as in the case of GeoNetwork (GN)-ebRIM [17]; (b) adding new classes, classification schemes, associations, and slots with semantic information to extend the ebRIM, as in the case of the George Mason University (GMU)-CSW [16]; and (c) disassembling the concept of ontology and relationships to extend the ebRIM [18]. Adding semantic information to a catalog using two different methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%