Proceedings. Fourth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design, 2004. ACSD 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/csd.2004.1309120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semantics of security protocol language (SPL) using a class of composable high-level Petri nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we briefly recall the syntax, the intuitive semantics of SPL and some examples of its S-net translation (for the last, see also [BKP04] We use the vector notation x which abbreviates some possibly empty list x 1 , . .…”
Section: Syntax and Intuitive Semantics Of Splmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we briefly recall the syntax, the intuitive semantics of SPL and some examples of its S-net translation (for the last, see also [BKP04] We use the vector notation x which abbreviates some possibly empty list x 1 , . .…”
Section: Syntax and Intuitive Semantics Of Splmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each SPL process may be translated compositionally into a corresponding S-net, as defined in [BKP04], providing its high-level Petri net representation. S-nets, like other high-level Petri net models, carry the usual annotations on places (types, i.e., sets of allowed tokens), arcs (multisets of net variables) and transitions (guards which are Boolean expressions playing the role of occurrence conditions).…”
Section: S-net Semantics Of Splmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations