1982
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1790(82)90023-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semi-automated procedure for the assay of 23 enzymes from Drosophila melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16) and from the slow development line (lanes [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Note the prevalence oflarge rDNA spacers (6.8-9.5 kb) having high copy number (dark intensity) in samples from the fast line (lanes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The weighted mean emergence time of all flies (n = 8,775) in the fast line was 11.19 days, whereas the flies (n = 6,530) in the slow line emerged in 11.74 days. Thus, flies in the fast line emerged about 13 hr earlier, on the average, than flies in the slow line; t tests showed that differences between the fast and slow lines were significant (P < 0.001) in all three experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16) and from the slow development line (lanes [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Note the prevalence oflarge rDNA spacers (6.8-9.5 kb) having high copy number (dark intensity) in samples from the fast line (lanes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The weighted mean emergence time of all flies (n = 8,775) in the fast line was 11.19 days, whereas the flies (n = 6,530) in the slow line emerged in 11.74 days. Thus, flies in the fast line emerged about 13 hr earlier, on the average, than flies in the slow line; t tests showed that differences between the fast and slow lines were significant (P < 0.001) in all three experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzyme assays were performed as described (3,4) at 300C in 0.1 ml of homogenate per 0.9 ml of reaction mixture in a Gilford model 250 spectrophotometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result might be explained as the possible consequence of the egg production processes at metabolic level. Also, a large amount of variation was observed in assays of D. melanogaster females, and it was preferable to use males for enzyme assay procedures (Stam and Laurie-Ahlberg, 1982). In this study we analysed males in all other experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assay procedures have been described by Avise and McDonald (1976), Stam and Laurie-Ahlberg (1982), and Marinkovi6 et al (1984b). The homogenization buffer was 0.01 M KH 2 P0 4 , 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assay procedures have been described by Avise and McDonald (1976), Stam and Laurie-Ahlberg (1982), and Marinkovi6 et al (1984b Flies from the 1985 sample were also used for electrophoretic analysis of 7 gene-enzyme systems, i.e. of G-6pdh, 6-Pgdh, a-Gpdh, Adh, Hk, Me, and Idh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%