2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00033-015-0582-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semilinear parabolic system with a free boundary

Abstract: This paper deals with a semilinear parabolic system with free boundary in one space dimension. We suppose that unknown functions $u$ and $v$ undergo nonlinear reactions $u^q$ and $v^p$, and exist initially in a interval $\{0\leq x\leq s(0)\}$, but expand to the right with spreading front $\{x=s(t)\}$, with $s(t)$ evolving according to the free boundary condition $s'(t)=-\mu (u_x+\rho v_x)$, where $p,\, q,\, \mu, \,\rho$ are given positive constants. The main purpose of this paper is to understand the existence… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Wang [26,27] dealt with the case that both predator and prey live in a bounded area at the initial state. For more mathematical problems with free boundary conditions, we refer the readers to [4,6,12,13,14,31,32] and some of the references cited therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Wang [26,27] dealt with the case that both predator and prey live in a bounded area at the initial state. For more mathematical problems with free boundary conditions, we refer the readers to [4,6,12,13,14,31,32] and some of the references cited therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. The proof is almost exactly the same as that of [42,Theorem 5.1]. For sake of completeness, in the following we still state it in a rough outline.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It is not difficult to see that if m(x) ≥ 1 in R and (19) holds, then the unique nonnegative solution (u, h, g) of problem (1) The following lemma can be verified by similar way as in [11] (see also, for example, [42], or proofs of Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4 in this paper), and we omit details here.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof of Theorem 2.2 in essence follows similar arguments as in [37][38][39]42]. For the regularity results and estimates of (u, v 1 , v 2 , h), please refer to Theorem 2.2 of [39].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 93%