“…In section 3.5 of [11], in order to present results from the perspective of semiring isomorphisms, the author considers multiplicative PCMs with entries p ij 2 1 a ; a  à with a > 1 and additive PCMs with entries a ij 2 ½0; 1, that are subsets of underlying sets of K  ¼ ð½0; þ1Þ; È Â ;  ; e  ; e Â Þ and K þ ¼ ð½À1; þ1Þ; È þ ; þ ; e þ ; e þ Þ, respectively. By Remark 2.2, multiplicative alo-group and fuzzy alo-group are isomorphic between them; in particular the function [3]:…”
Section: Counterpart Results Under Alo-group Isomorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ðK; ÈÞ is a commutative monoid with identity element e: Main results of [11] can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Two Special Semirings For Dealing With Multiplicative and Admentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, multiplicative and additive reciprocity in (2.1) and (2.2) can be generalized to a PCM defined over a general semiring ðK; È; ; e; eÞ, in the following way: However, the author in [11] does not aim at generalizing the approach to a general semiring, he introduces the semirings K  and K þ for dealing with multiplicative and additive PCMs respectively; moreover, both each p 2 ð0; þ1Þ (or in ½ 1 a ; a with a > 1) and each a 2 ½0; 1 has the inverse element with respect to  and þ respectively, thus they can be entries of multiplicative and additive PCMs.…”
Section: A Comparison Between the Two Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between K  ¼ ð½0; þ1Þ; È Â ;  ; e  ; e Â Þ and 0; þ1½= ð0; þ1½; Á; 6Þ for dealing with PCMs Firstly, the case described in section 3.2 of [11], i.e. p ij 2 ð0; þ1Þ, is analyzed; thus, by considering K  and 0 þ 1½ for the discussion of PCMs, the following considerations can be done:…”
Section: A Comparison Between the Two Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [11], the author proposes two special semirings to discuss PCMs; the approach is summarized in Section 2.1; in Section 2.2, abelian linearly ordered groups are shown for dealing with PCMs (see [3][4][5][6][7][8] for further details). In Section 3 a comparison between the two approaches is performed in order to choose the more convenient one.…”
“…In section 3.5 of [11], in order to present results from the perspective of semiring isomorphisms, the author considers multiplicative PCMs with entries p ij 2 1 a ; a  à with a > 1 and additive PCMs with entries a ij 2 ½0; 1, that are subsets of underlying sets of K  ¼ ð½0; þ1Þ; È Â ;  ; e  ; e Â Þ and K þ ¼ ð½À1; þ1Þ; È þ ; þ ; e þ ; e þ Þ, respectively. By Remark 2.2, multiplicative alo-group and fuzzy alo-group are isomorphic between them; in particular the function [3]:…”
Section: Counterpart Results Under Alo-group Isomorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ðK; ÈÞ is a commutative monoid with identity element e: Main results of [11] can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Two Special Semirings For Dealing With Multiplicative and Admentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, multiplicative and additive reciprocity in (2.1) and (2.2) can be generalized to a PCM defined over a general semiring ðK; È; ; e; eÞ, in the following way: However, the author in [11] does not aim at generalizing the approach to a general semiring, he introduces the semirings K  and K þ for dealing with multiplicative and additive PCMs respectively; moreover, both each p 2 ð0; þ1Þ (or in ½ 1 a ; a with a > 1) and each a 2 ½0; 1 has the inverse element with respect to  and þ respectively, thus they can be entries of multiplicative and additive PCMs.…”
Section: A Comparison Between the Two Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between K  ¼ ð½0; þ1Þ; È Â ;  ; e  ; e Â Þ and 0; þ1½= ð0; þ1½; Á; 6Þ for dealing with PCMs Firstly, the case described in section 3.2 of [11], i.e. p ij 2 ð0; þ1Þ, is analyzed; thus, by considering K  and 0 þ 1½ for the discussion of PCMs, the following considerations can be done:…”
Section: A Comparison Between the Two Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [11], the author proposes two special semirings to discuss PCMs; the approach is summarized in Section 2.1; in Section 2.2, abelian linearly ordered groups are shown for dealing with PCMs (see [3][4][5][6][7][8] for further details). In Section 3 a comparison between the two approaches is performed in order to choose the more convenient one.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.