2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A semisupervised autoencoder-based approach for anomaly detection in high performance computing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first work based on fine grain monitoring of power and performance, that targets SCs and DC compute nodes, along with their requirements (e.g., scalability, and reasonable overhead for in-band monitoring, to do not impact computing resources), and that reports a comprehensive analysis with a vast number of malware. When comparing with the analysis via performance counters, in line with other SoA works in literature targeting anomaly detection in SCs [28], [65], we obtain superior results when using IF and AE, rather than oc-SVM. In particular, in our experience the main problem with oc-SVM is that the feature space is not well separable for performance counters, and thus it is difficult to find a good tuning (e.g., kernel coefficient, PCA components, etc.)…”
Section: B Malware Detection Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Notice that, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first work based on fine grain monitoring of power and performance, that targets SCs and DC compute nodes, along with their requirements (e.g., scalability, and reasonable overhead for in-band monitoring, to do not impact computing resources), and that reports a comprehensive analysis with a vast number of malware. When comparing with the analysis via performance counters, in line with other SoA works in literature targeting anomaly detection in SCs [28], [65], we obtain superior results when using IF and AE, rather than oc-SVM. In particular, in our experience the main problem with oc-SVM is that the feature space is not well separable for performance counters, and thus it is difficult to find a good tuning (e.g., kernel coefficient, PCA components, etc.)…”
Section: B Malware Detection Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Autoencoder: Borghesi et al have proposed an autoencoder architecture for anomaly detection using HPC time series data [10], [56]. The autoencoder is trained using only "healthy" telemetry data, and it learns a compressed representation of this data.…”
Section: B Machine Learning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a typical scenario that would be encountered if ML systems are deployed to production. We train the autoencoder-based anomaly detection framework [10], Coverage Fig. 7.…”
Section: F Investigating Misclassificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vincent et al [29] built a self-encoding noise reduction model that can restore the input data with noise to the data without noise. Borghesi et al [30] used a semi-supervised anomaly detection method based on an autoencoder. The autoencoder uses the idea of encoding and decoding to suppress the noise in time-series, which makes the model more robust, but the autoencoder is theoretically better at dealing with one-dimensional time-series [9] because this structure is unable to obtain the correlation between multidimensional time series data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%