1982
DOI: 10.1097/00005176-198201020-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sensitive Analytical Apparatus for Measuring Hydrogen Production Rates. II. Application to Studies in Human Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study (17) , comparing a nasal prong collection technique with the Haldane-Priestly technique, found a good correlation coefficient (r = 0.94) between these two techniques for sampling end-tidal gas concentrations, with the values obtained by the nasal prong technique being slightly higher than those obtained via the Haldane-Priestly tube technique. However, both MacLean and Fink (29) and Stevenson et al (30) reported that the nasal prong technique yielded consistently lower Hz concentrations than those obtained by oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal catheters. Both nasal prong and nasopharyngeal catheter breath collection techniques have been compared to simultaneous determinations of Hz excretion rate (30).…”
Section: Collection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study (17) , comparing a nasal prong collection technique with the Haldane-Priestly technique, found a good correlation coefficient (r = 0.94) between these two techniques for sampling end-tidal gas concentrations, with the values obtained by the nasal prong technique being slightly higher than those obtained via the Haldane-Priestly tube technique. However, both MacLean and Fink (29) and Stevenson et al (30) reported that the nasal prong technique yielded consistently lower Hz concentrations than those obtained by oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal catheters. Both nasal prong and nasopharyngeal catheter breath collection techniques have been compared to simultaneous determinations of Hz excretion rate (30).…”
Section: Collection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite the simple and straightforward nature of the method , investigators and clinicians have been presented with a myriad of expressions for quantifying breath H 2 • This is related mostly to the different breath collection techniques employed. When breath samples are obtained via rebreathing systems (10,12,14,18,21) or continuous flowthrough apparatuses (30), breath H 2 is quantified in terms of excretion rate in units of volume divided by time (ml/min, ml/h , rnl/rnin/kg, etc.). When the collection technique is based on either whole breath (16,27) or end-tidal (15,17,19 ,20) volume fractions, breath H 2 is quantified in terms of concentration units which are typically expressed as ppm, p,I/L, or p,mollL.…”
Section: Standardization Of Breath H 2 Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods and instruments to sample alveolar air are based on devices that allow dead-space air to be separated and discarded while the remaining end-expiratory (alveolar) air is collected in a gas-tight bag. Methods that have been used in children include face masks [146,147], rebreathing bags [148], nasal prong [149], and oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal catheters [150,151]. In younger (noncollaborative) children, exhaled air can be collected using a face-mask connected to a double bag by means of a T-valve [152].…”
Section: H 2 -Breath Test: Principles and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breath hydrogen tests were undertaken in five children as described previously [13]. Following an overnight fast and collection of a baseline breath sample, lactulose (1 g/kg) was given orally and breath samples collected for 3 h thereafter at 30 min intervals.…”
Section: Lactulose Breath Hydrogen Testmentioning
confidence: 99%