2007
DOI: 10.1145/1276920.1276924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sequent calculus and a theorem prover for standard conditional logics

Abstract: In this paper we present a cut-free sequent calculus, called SeqS, for some standard conditional logics. The calculus uses labels and transition formulas and can be used to prove decidability and space complexity bounds for the respective logics. We also show that these calculi can be the base for uniform proof systems. Moreover, we present CondLean, a theorem prover in Prolog for these calculi. ACM Reference Format:Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G., and Schwind, C., 2007. A sequent calculus and a theorem prover for s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reproves known complexity bounds originally shown in [13] (alternative short proofs using coalgebraic semantics are given in [17]). For CKCEM, the bound can be improved to coNP using dynamic programming in the same style as in [20].…”
Section: Complexity Of Proof Searchsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This reproves known complexity bounds originally shown in [13] (alternative short proofs using coalgebraic semantics are given in [17]). For CKCEM, the bound can be improved to coNP using dynamic programming in the same style as in [20].…”
Section: Complexity Of Proof Searchsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…We note that the complexity of CKMPCEM was explicitly left open in [13]. We also note that regrettably we were not able to reproduce our claim from [18] that CKMPCEM is in coNP, the problem being that the estimate (7.1) breaks down in the presence of (MP g ) and (MPCEM) g ; since no better lower bound than coNP is currently known for CKMPCEM and CKIDMPCEM, this means that the exact complexity of these logics remains open.…”
Section: Complexity Of Proof Searchmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another topic which deserves investigation is the precise relation of nested sequent calculi with other calculi for conditional logics, in particular with labelled calculi. Some labelled calculi for the conditional logics considered in this work have been presented in [28]. It would be interesting whether we can find a mapping between those calculi and nested sequent ones, as done by Fitting in his compresive work [12], where he establishes a tight correspondence between nested sequent calculi for modal logics and prefixed tableaux.…”
Section: Further Topicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Just to mention some work, to the first stream belongs [2] proposing a calculus for (unnested) cumulative logic C (see below). More recently, [28] presents modular labeled calculi (of optimal complexity) for CK and some of its extensions, basing on the selection function semantics, and [19] presents modular labeled calculi for preferential logic PCL and its extensions. The latter calculi take advantage of a sort of hybrid modal translation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%